02:38, 5 April 2011 (UTC) I've created Wiktionary:Votes/2011-04/Derivations categories as a separate vote. --Yair rand 05:36, 5 April 2011 (UTC) I don't...
pattern. --Yair rand 09:11, 11 April 2011 (UTC) The following categories should IMO be dealt with by this vote also: Terms derived from constructed languages...
and the person responsible for the vote, so you should revert me as you see fit. --Dan Polansky 09:20, 6 April 2011 (UTC) Hopefully I went even further...
on User:Flubot/lists and handled it manually. --flyax 21:07, 3 April 2011 (UTC) Then you have my support. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:09, 4 April 2011 (UTC)...
unacceptably far. —RuakhTALK 04:29, 27 April 2011 (UTC) Re: #3: I admit that I have not noticed the issue when creating the vote. But I have now also realized...
21 June 2011 (UTC) I restricted the scope of the vote to Mn, at least per this discussion. Feel free to revise that. --Daniel 04:04, 27 June 2011 (UTC)...
may be more appropriate in article names); and I interpret the vote I wrote as allowing this discretion. - -sche (discuss) 01:04, 6 October 2011 (UTC)...
suggest renaming this vote to anything more explanatory, such as from Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-12/CFI amendment (2) to Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-12/Attestation...
conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions. Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2011-12/User:タチコマ robot I did reply to you. Sorry I did not immediately notice...
important to know that, so I think it should be mentioned in the vote. --Daniel. 04:34, 21 May 2011 (UTC) Just a minor point really, but what would the templates'...