17:19, 16 June 2014 (UTC) Discussion has continued at [[Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2014-06/Excluding romanizations by default#merge the votes]].—msh210℠ (talk)...
talk:Votes/pl-2014-06/Allowing attested romanizations#merge the votes]]; please comment there.—msh210℠ (talk) 17:19, 16 June 2014 (UTC) I think the votes...
clear that this vote applies only to Cyrl (i.e. modern Cyrillic) and not to Cyrs (i.e. Early Cyrillic)? —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 18:10, 29 June 2014 (UTC) Is it better...
receive general acceptance in principle, but little enthusiasm. —Michael Z. 2014-06-16 22:07 z It may be partially possible but it's a bit involved and not...
March 2014 (UTC) Good idea. It could be "Unified Norwegian" on the model of Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-06/Unified Serbo-Croatian, Wiktionary:Votes/2011-09/Unified...
supporters of the proposal. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:06, 7 December 2014 (UTC) Am I eligible to vote on this even though I am not an administrator? Kaixinguo...
currently-ongoing votes. - -sche (discuss) 01:50, 28 March 2014 (UTC) Thanks. It has now been mentioned in the vote itself. Wyang (talk) 03:11, 28 March 2014 (UTC)...
in Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2010-03/User:MewBot for bot status for adding Dutch inflected forms. --Dan Polansky (talk) 20:19, 17 August 2014 (UTC) CodeCat's...
(talk) 06:07, 5 September 2014 (UTC) That does not work when the title is at the beginning of a sentence. --WikiTiki89 19:21, 5 September 2014 (UTC) You're...
23 January 2014 (UTC) If you put what you just said explicitly into the vote, I will be satisfied. --WikiTiki89 05:06, 23 January 2014 (UTC) That seems...