10 Results found for "Wiktionary_talk:Votes/2016-02".

Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-02/CFI: List of terms

withdrawing the votes that are clearly going to fail, but only 1 does seem to fit: Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-01/Pronunciation Other votes either look like...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/2016-02/Removing "Quotations"

your unexplained ping that you are formally asking me to close this vote. :p Maybe a bit later today! --Daniel Carrero (talk) 21:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/2016-02/Multiple pronunciation sections

kind of meaningless. --WikiTiki89 02:42, 7 February 2016 (UTC)  Done --Daniel Carrero (talk) 02:44, 7 February 2016 (UTC) I don't think you really understood...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-02/Removing "Flexibility"

by the design and implementation of templates"? DCDuring TALK 16:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC) My opinion is: For undecided and undiscussed matters, we can...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/2016-02/Placement of "Usage notes"

February 2016 (UTC) You can mention what your preference is, but I think it would get too complicated if we had a system of weighted votes. --WikiTiki89...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-02/Language 2

be"-statements. @Daniel Carrero —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 02:27, 12 February 2016 (UTC)  Done --Daniel Carrero (talk) 02:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/2016-02/Placement of "Alternative forms"

required to be listed in a POS-specific way if this vote passes. - -sche (discuss) 19:40, 18 February 2016 (UTC) If this ever gets approved, then that means...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/2016-02/Using frwikt language header style

If this vote passes, will tabbed languages continue to work as previously? —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 10:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC) @Angr: Yes, I tested using TabbedLanguages...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-02/Trivia

fan of having "Trivia" sections... - -sche (discuss) 05:48, 18 February 2016 (UTC) I'm unsure. Depends on the data; has anyone tried to assess what Trivia...


Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2016-02/Entry name 3

the vote as it is, it has higher chance of passing. Adding that rule (if needed) can be done later. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 21:15, 9 February 2016 (UTC)...