mention what your preference is, but I think it would get too complicated if we had a system of weighted votes. --WikiTiki89 20:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)...
required to be listed in a POS-specific way if this vote passes. - -sche (discuss) 19:40, 18 February 2016 (UTC) If this ever gets approved, then that means...
under the verb? Wouldn't that get kind of repetitive? PseudoSkull (talk) 02:00, 1 October 2016 (UTC) If this vote passes and people want to keep these entries...
about the voting format. @Wikitiki89, if I remember correctly, it was you who designed the voting system of Wiktionary:Votes/2016-02/Placement of "Usage...
experts for placement after this discussion has matured. In Usage notes, editors should include references to which category/ies each meaning of a term belongs...
{{term-context}} designed specifically for placement to the right of the headword. Chuck Entz (talk) 01:39, 15 March 2016 (UTC) Well, I was suggesting that you...
with a footnote consisting of a link to Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2015-10/Headword line (discussion and voting on a recent set of proposed edits to policies...
created Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-02/Spaces in links. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 04:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC) Proposal: replace the 2 instances of "wiki code" in...
"Alternative forms" header to state that, as per Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2016-09/Placement of "Alternative forms" 2 (weaker proposal), editors can choose...
Template_talk:rank#Placement I think we should change the placement of the Gutenberg rankings. I think the easiest change would be to move them from the top of the English...