beneficial to format the vote in a way similar to Wiktionary:Votes/2020-04/New reconstruction headers or Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2020-04/Attestation of comparatives...
if I'm somehow wrong about that, it's still inappropriate to create a vote with no discussion.) —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 02:17, 24 June 2020 (UTC)...
an option people are allowed to vote in favor of. —Mahāgaja · talk 06:34, 7 June 2020 (UTC) As far as the use of "eye dialect" label is concerned, Option...
s"_and_"Alternative_reconstructions"_in_WT:EL?. --{{victar|talk}} 06:40, 4 May 2020 (UTC) Ah, thanks. I see the conversation took place and I missed it...
Votes that have not been closed. Templates used in votes: {{vote-generic}}, {{vote-sysop}}, {{vote-bureaucrat}}, {{vote-checkuser}}, {{vote-bot}};...
been deleted?). - -sche (discuss) 20:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC) @-sche, I kinda find the vote overly complicated. Like, I don't even follow it. I think...
failed Wiktionary:Votes/2019-06/Language code into reference template names. Stop the nasty crap. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:38, 10 April 2020 (UTC) Plus you...
preexisting wording that is not even a policy. In the COALMINE vote you mention (Wiktionary:Votes/2019-08/Rescinding the "Coalmine" policy), the wording change...
noun and come under a 'Noun' L3 header. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 06:24, 9 March 2020 (UTC) There is no feasable definition of "letter" given. If a letter...
Wiktionary:Votes/2020-03/Letter entries to be Translingual exists, though it doesn't appear to have started --DannyS712 (talk) 20:30, 1 August 2020 (UTC) That's...