should I simply start another vote, Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-08/Voting eligibility 2 ? --Ivan Štambuk 03:21, 17 August 2009 (UTC) Either one sounds find...
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-08/Voting eligibility 2 does not pass Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2009-08/User:MalafayaBot for bot status passes Wiktionary:Votes/2009-08/Rename...
it. --Ivan Štambuk 13:48, 17 August 2009 (UTC) With the introduction of sub-votes, is one user entitled to vote in one or in both of them? The uſer hight...
withdraw the vote Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-08/Common placenames get entries, by placing a note to the vote that says that you withdraw the vote. As you know...
all these changes? Or is it manual work? --Rising Sun 09:54, 4 September 2009 (UTC) I'm a bit confused by this. I supposed I've always assumed that people...
derived words, they may have synonyms, anagrams, etc. They should be described as words, because they are words. Lmaltier 16:48, 8 September 2009 (UTC)...
did: unpass Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-03/Removing vote requirements for policy changes create Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-03/Vote requirements for policy...
→ ¢ • τ 00:44, 20 December 2009 (UTC) Possibly "Illustrations" as Visviva suggests. --Bequw → ¢ • τ 08:22, 20 December 2009 (UTC) Yeah, either of those...
at least, I personally would be more likely to vote for it in that case.—msh210℠ 15:19, 4 May 2009 (UTC) The idea is to avoid citing every single name...
the guidelines outlined in the proposal policy WT:ASH. Lmaltier 08:31, 30 June 2009 (UTC) It would be misleading to imply that we're somehow "prohibiting"...