redirects is this vote about - hard or soft? Hard redirects don't require citations. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 01:50, 15 August 2014 (UTC) This is about...
number of entries for any word by 5-10 times. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 14:07, 16 August 2014 (UTC) I'm not sure I understand what you mean. What, exactly, is it...
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2014-06/Allowing attested romanizations may fail over a disagreement over wording and its implications. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:04, 14...
--Dan Polansky (talk) 07:53, 15 March 2014 (UTC) Good idea. It could be "Unified Norwegian" on the model of Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-06/Unified Serbo-Croatian...
this vote 3 months long? I find that excessive. --{{victar|talk}} 08:33, 25 January 2019 (UTC) It is because it took Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2014-07/Allowing...
currently-ongoing votes. - -sche (discuss) 01:50, 28 March 2014 (UTC) Thanks. It has now been mentioned in the vote itself. Wyang (talk) 03:11, 28 March 2014 (UTC)...
no one uses, such as Joyce's "bababadalgharagh...". In Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2011-04/CFI: Removing usage in a well-known work, there was the objection...
general acceptance in principle, but little enthusiasm. —Michael Z. 2014-06-16 22:07 z It may be partially possible but it's a bit involved and not everyone...
the longest; there is a tradition of extending votes where deemed apppropriate, e.g. in Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-05/Placenames with linguistic information...
ratio, e.g. Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2014-12/Making simplified Chinese soft-redirect to traditional Chinese; Wiktionary talk:Votes/pl-2014-12/Making simplified...