Related to ๐ ๐ฟ๐ป๐ธ๐ฟ๐ (wulรพus, โgloryโ).
It is not certain that this word in fact existed as a noun; it has also been credibly suggested that the attestation wulรพrais (in Codex Ambrosianus A; this would morphologically be the genitive of an i-stem noun) is to be viewed as the genitive to a noun wulรพris derived from a comparative adjective; the parallel attestation wulรพris (in Codex Ambrosianus B) would then simply be the nominative. A comparative adjective is in fact attested elsewhere as ๐ ๐ฟ๐ป๐ธ๐๐น๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฝ๐ (wulรพrizans), which suggests the existence of an adjective *wulรพrs. For more, see references below; Falluomini's reading (both a noun and an adjective *wulรพrs existed) is followed here.
๐ ๐ฟ๐ป๐ธ๐๐ โข (wulรพrs) f
Attested in only one place in the corpus, but in two manuscripts: Codex Ambrosianus A has the expected genitive singular form ๐ ๐ฟ๐ป๐ธ๐๐ฐ๐น๐ (wulรพrais), whereas Codex Ambrosianus B has ๐ ๐ฟ๐ป๐ธ๐๐น๐ (wulรพris).
Feminine i-stem | ||
---|---|---|
Singular | Plural | |
Nominative | ๐
๐ฟ๐ป๐ธ๐๐ wulรพrs |
๐
๐ฟ๐ป๐ธ๐๐ด๐น๐ wulรพreis |
Vocative | ๐
๐ฟ๐ป๐ธ๐ wulรพr |
๐
๐ฟ๐ป๐ธ๐๐ด๐น๐ wulรพreis |
Accusative | ๐
๐ฟ๐ป๐ธ๐ wulรพr |
๐
๐ฟ๐ป๐ธ๐๐น๐ฝ๐ wulรพrins |
Genitive | ๐
๐ฟ๐ป๐ธ๐๐ฐ๐น๐ wulรพrais |
๐
๐ฟ๐ป๐ธ๐๐ด wulรพrฤ |
Dative | ๐
๐ฟ๐ป๐ธ๐๐ฐ๐น wulรพrai |
๐
๐ฟ๐ป๐ธ๐๐น๐ผ wulรพrim |