Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Appendix talk:Religions. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Appendix talk:Religions, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Appendix talk:Religions in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Appendix talk:Religions you have here. The definition of the word
Appendix talk:Religions will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Appendix talk:Religions, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Whoa. This could use sections on Observances, Practices, Tenets (terminology), Artifacts and perhaps even Important names (e.g. Moses.) I see this has gotten a healthy start so far. Well done. --Connel MacKenzie T C 05:00, 14 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
- I was thinking of some things along those lines - e.g., reference to the title of a holy person (imam, minister, priest, rabbi, etc), and related parts of speech (preistly, rabbinic or rabbinical); associated texts (Bible, Koran, Talmud), and likewise related parts of speech (Biblical, Biblically, Talmudic, etc). This may be too big of a proposal for one page, but I'd also like to have each term in many languages. Cheers! bd2412 T 13:04, 14 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
- Again, well done. If it does grow to significant size, it can be split apart later. I think having translations anywhere other than on the entries themselves, will probably meet objections. --Connel MacKenzie T C 16:28, 14 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
- Hmmm... perhaps just a note on common principles in translation; e.g. in German all of the terms would be capitalized, and almost everything ending in an "-ism" would become "-ismus" while those ending in "-ist" and "-ists" would stay the same; in Spanish and Portuguese these would generally become "-ísmo", "-ísta" and "-ístas", respectively. bd2412 T 16:57, 14 June 2006 (UTC)Reply