Category talk:English entries needing definition

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

And likewise for other languages. The requests categories are rather inconsistently named, so this is my attempt to make them more consistent. I'm not sure what to do about Category:Translation requests (Dutch). Category:Dutch entries needing translation is misleading as it's actually the English entries that have translations. It could alternatively be Category:Terms needing Dutch translation, but then the name doesn't start with the language name anymore, which is not as convenient from a technical point of view. —CodeCat 17:17, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'll oppose Category:Dutch translations needing verification because the term verification is usually used for our WT:RFV process but that's not what it's about at all. -- Liliana • 17:44, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

I did consider "needing checking" but that sounds more awkward. —CodeCat 17:51, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Support all but the translations one. Not because of the word "verification" (although I'm against that too), but because it can be mistaken for a category for Dutch entries, rather than translations at English entries. --WikiTiki89 18:00, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Well, we also have Category:Russian translations lacking transliteration and Category:Russian terms with incomplete gender. {{t}} adds entries to both of those. —CodeCat 18:08, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

I've done them now, but I wonder what should be done with the translations category. —CodeCat 21:31, 30 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Entirely unnecessary renames. --Dan Polansky (talk) 18:23, 14 September 2014 (UTC)Reply