Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Module talk:category tree/non-lemma forms. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Module talk:category tree/non-lemma forms, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Module talk:category tree/non-lemma forms in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Module talk:category tree/non-lemma forms you have here. The definition of the word
Module talk:category tree/non-lemma forms will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Module talk:category tree/non-lemma forms, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
labels = {
description = "{{{langname}}} nouns that are inflected to be quantified as more than one (more than two in some languages with dual number).",
fundamental = "Non-lemma forms subcategories by language",
parents = {"noun forms"},
}
labels = {
description = "{{{langname}}} nouns that are inflected to be quantified as more than one (more than two in some languages with dual number).",
fundamental = "Non-lemma forms subcategories by language",
parents = {{name = "noun forms", sort = "plural"}},
}
Both of these have the same description and are used basically for the same purpose. I think we should either change plurals to be more general ({{{langname}}} terms that are...) and move it out of noun forms, or just remove it. I originally came here looking for the duals equivalent of plurals and discovered that noun dual forms and others already existed, so, I think that we shouldn't switch to a scheme similar to plurals because noun * forms already have it all. Enosh (talk) 14:34, 25 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
- I agree. —CodeCat 15:34, 25 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
- So, should I delete
labels... or what? Enosh (talk) 16:58, 2 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
- That would just break all the existing "plurals" categories. Those need to be empty first. But have you discussed this with other editors? —CodeCat 18:00, 2 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
- I haven't, should this be discussed in WT:BP? Enosh (talk) 18:16, 2 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
- I'd say so, yes. —CodeCat 18:22, 2 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Paucal forms should be added as well. فين أخاي (talk) 02:41, 2 November 2020 (UTC)Reply