Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/déḱm̥. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/déḱm̥, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/déḱm̥ in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/déḱm̥ you have here. The definition of the word
Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/déḱm̥ will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Reconstruction talk:Proto-Indo-European/déḱm̥, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Kurdish Wikipedia has دەه instead of ده as the Arabic spelling of deh. Is it right? The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 14:52, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
- I checked the Kurdish Wikipedia for w:ku:Deh, but I did not find any Arabic script on the page you specified. They do have the Latin spelling of dehe included, but I must say I am not familiar with that spelling either. I checked all the dictionaries I have at home and none of them show ده ه. All of them have the spelling ده. So I am sure ده is the correct spelling. Gbeebani 21:27, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
- Ok, on Kurdish Wikipedia you saw the Latin version and the version in Arabic script with دەه appears, if you click on the upper right corner tîpên erebî. Obviously, their software to switch from script to script is not as elaborate as that on Serbian and Chinese Wikipedia... I have not checked any dictionaries for this (I found only dictionaries in Latin script and one in Cyrillic online), so I shall restrain my remarks about those spellings, until I come across a reliable dictionary, after it turned out that tîpên erebî in Kurdish Wikipedia is not that reliable... The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 21:42, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Under the cardinal box there are reconstructed collective and cardinal forms and I can't add them to the template of cardinal box. Given that reconstructed forms from 20 to 90 (and 100 ?) are derived from 10, it is possible to reconstruct collective and ordinal forms of these numbers easily, in other words there are reconstructed collective and ordinal forms for all these numbers and they're absent from their entries. Can an admin do something ? Malku H₂n̥rés (talk) 20:35, 2 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
please fix this 38.43.32.16 01:44, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply