Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
you have here. The definition of the word
will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
@Atitarev, Cinemantique, Wikitiki89 I'm guessing that the assimilated palatal м in the manually given IPA pronunciation here is incorrect? Benwing2 (talk) 01:44, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
- @Atitarev, Cinemantique, Wikitiki89 Is this consistent in all instances of мп, мб, мф, фм? If so, we can make this an optional assimilation and use ⁽ʲ⁾. What about пл (аппликация), вб (вбирать), вп (впечатлительный), вл (выявлять), фл (конфликт), бв (обвинительный), бм (обмер), пф (сапфир)? All of these have labials before a a palatalized consonant (often another labial). Also, what about подснежник, which the module renders as ? Should there be palatal assimilation? Benwing2 (talk) 02:10, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
- Yes, it's consistent and I don't mind if you implement the optional palatalisations for мп, мб, мф, фм. I'll wait for Cinemantique to reply on others. IMHO, пл, вб, вп, вл, фл, бв, бм, пф don't have a consecutive palatalisation but I may be wrong. I have less certainty about бв and пф, подснежник is OK as is. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 02:15, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
- I think there's no assimilation if Avanesov say nothing about it. So вл, пл, пф, фл haven't it.
- бв: now optional assimilation (любви́), except
^обв- (no assimilation).
- бм: no assimilation.
- вб, вп: optional if it's at the beginning of a word, otherwise no assimilation.--Cinemantique (talk) 03:09, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply