Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:Amerikkkan. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:Amerikkkan, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:Amerikkkan in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:Amerikkkan you have here. The definition of the word Talk:Amerikkkan will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:Amerikkkan, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
RFV discussion
Latest comment: 14 years ago11 comments4 people in discussion
Question all you want, but I find it pointless to try and work on more citations with nothing more than a vague question. And seriously, Google Books has dozens of uses, so I don't see how you could deny it exists.--Prosfilaes02:54, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Interesting! Earlier, there was almost nothing on Google Books; now, as you note, there are a great many examples. It's happened before that I look a word up and find only a few citations, go back later and find one more has appeared, but it's never been this dramatic. Amerikkkan and Amerikkkans have more now, too. Well, I'm persuaded that they're real, now. — Beobach03:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
I have added another citation of a book, because I do question whether an album is "durably archived". I'll add a few more book citations to these words and strike them as passed. — Beobach03:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
These were spotted by Squidonius, it would be nice to add some cites given that they have "possibly wrong" triple letters. Conrad.Irwin14:58, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Amerikkkan seems to be cited, though just barely (and the plural Amerikkkans seems to be barely attestable, too). Amerikkka, as I note above, may not be. — Beobach01:18, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Unless there's a reason to doubt that it's used as a singular noun, I wouldn't worry about it. I mean, this isn't even a distinct word, but just a politicized way of spelling American; even North Amerikkkan (meaning "North American") is attestable from b.g.c., and this Usenet post refers to the movie American Pie as "AmeriKKKan pie". But if it's keeping you up at night — this book seems to use it as a noun at least twice, though annoyingly Google Books isn't willing to show me any of the relevant pages. Or, for some Usenet cites: . —RuakhTALK05:53, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
