Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:MVC. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:MVC, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:MVC in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:MVC you have here. The definition of the word Talk:MVC will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:MVC, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Latest comment: 9 years ago12 comments8 people in discussion
opcode for "move characters" in IBM Assembler. Got a feeling we've deleted this kind of thing before. For those not technically inclined, this is akin to a keyword in a programming language, and probably isn't used in running text. Forgetting all higher-level languages and considering only assembler, there are all kinds of varieties. For example, here's a nice table of all the opcode mnemonics (abbreviations) for a Z80 processor: . Equinox◑00:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Delete. The same sequence of characters can have quite different meanings in different assembly languages, depending on the architecture of the processor- and there are lots of different processors. Plus, there are only so many short sequences of letters that evoke words and phrases, so one assembly language may use the same three letters for a completely different concept from another's. We don't want to get into the business of providing a keyword glossary for every assembly language that ever existed, and I don't look forward to verifying usage of assembler keywords for a processor that was only sold for 3 years 15 years ago. Chuck Entz (talk) 01:39, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
delete because this is not a word in a language (where "language" refers to natural languages only and not to programming languages) -- Liliana•18:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
It's still not a word because it doesn't convey any meaning. It's actually akin to a symbol, like ☫. That symbol doesn't convey any meaning, it's just that, a symbol, and that's why these don't have entries here (or at least, shouldn't, seeing as that link appears to be blue). The same applies to MVC, it doesn't have any specific meaning, it just symbolizes an operator. -- Liliana•19:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Not really for RFV. Semper posted what looks like attesting quotations at Citations:MVC, including "... with a single MVC instruction". What to make of these quotations as for wordhood seems to depend rather on editor judgment, and thus suits well for RFD, I think. I found "A <td> tag is placed at the beginning of an individual table cell"; does it support ] entry? Or does "... is extended again by the introduction of the elif keyword" support elif as a keyword of multiple programming/scripting languages? We had a discussion on this but I am too tired to search for it. --Dan Polansky (talk) 17:37, 12 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
Delete, it's not that it doesn't have meaning, but it's just too jargony and computer-language specific. bgcolor is more entry-worthy, and it probably shouldn't have one either. Perhaps some computer language keywords may have made it into mainstream usage, like goto or print, but I don't think this opcode fits the bill. Pengo (talk) 12:33, 13 September 2015 (UTC)Reply
