Talk:Royal Canadian Mounted Police

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:Royal Canadian Mounted Police. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:Royal Canadian Mounted Police, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:Royal Canadian Mounted Police in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:Royal Canadian Mounted Police you have here. The definition of the word Talk:Royal Canadian Mounted Police will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:Royal Canadian Mounted Police, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

RFD discussion: February–March 2022

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


·~ dictátor·mundꟾ 21:40, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

I would note that the RCMP are a cultural icon portrayed in countless movies and parodied in cartoons (see Dudley Do-Right, for instance) and nowadays almost never ride horses except in parades. Chuck Entz (talk) 22:02, 25 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Delete, encyclopedia stuff. See also Talk:Soviet_Armed_Forces, Talk:Provisional_IRA, Talk:United States Army. — Fytcha T | L | C 11:53, 26 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Fytcha Unfortunately, I can't find the deletion discussion for Talk:United States Army. The only discussion there is the one that voted to keep it. AG202 (talk) 08:41, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
@AG202: J3133 found the discussion: Talk:United_States_Marine_CorpsFytcha T | L | C 10:22, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! AG202 (talk) 22:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Keep all. We have a number of American and British equivalents (e.g., Federal Bureau of Investigation, Security Service). No basis for purging these unless one wants to argue that the U.S. or U.K. are somehow more worthy of coverage. WordyAndNerdy (talk) 07:11, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Weak delete as encyclopedic. Re "other stuff exists": well, nominate it for deletion, too! - -sche (discuss) 16:45, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Delete, not dictionary material. We probably have too many U.S. or UK encyclopedic entries too. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 15:02, 12 March 2022 (UTC)Reply