Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word User talk:Fytcha. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word User talk:Fytcha, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say User talk:Fytcha in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word User talk:Fytcha you have here. The definition of the word User talk:Fytcha will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofUser talk:Fytcha, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
I think for words like this one, it's best to document it as an originally Alemannic word (on the basis of morphology) that has been borrowed into German. — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 11:28, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
Latest comment: 11 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion
You wrote in the RfC: "Sense 1 is not the English infinitive morpheme, that would be -∅. The sentence "I could eat." contains a verb in the infinitive but no to. Rather, to is a particle that is used in conjunction with an already (zero-)marked infinitive. The box below, however, seems to contain a random mix of translations of the infinitive marker -∅ (e.g. German -en, Romanian -a, Turkish -mek) and the particle to (e.g. German zu, Romanian a)."
In "I could eat" eat is not an infinitive, being limited as to person.
Though some grammarians may agree with "to is a particle that is used in conjunction with an already (zero-)marked infinitive.", not all do. I don't think we can follow your treatment of English unmarked and marked infinitives.
I can't address the translation issue. It is not unusual to have analogous problems when we try to lexicalize grammar. I'm seeing this in considering English grammatical mood and English semantic periphrasis (including sentence adverbs) of what other languages languages treat as grammatical mood. DCDuring (talk) 00:28, 5 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
@DCDuring: As for 2, from a very brief Google search, I was able to find multiple sources that refer to the verb form following auxiliary could as the bare infinitive (, , ). If this is only a minority view among grammarians, I'd have no problems conceding this point and I'd update my example to "I must eat."
As for 3, I wasn't aware that that isn't a universally accepted analysis, thanks for telling me.
I think I may have been wrong about 2. After all, the putative infinitive doesn't inflect (plural). I think of modal verbs as being adjunct-like as often they can be replaced by sentence adverbs.
My objection is really to using null marker or ∅- or zero- in a work that I thought was a service we are providing for normal human beings, rather than linguistics majors. Bare infinitive isn't too much better, but some normals could guess at what is referred to. I don't think many normal humans could even define infinitive in a way linguists would find acceptable. Not very many dictionaries have separate definitions for bare infinitive or for to infinitive, sometimes having them at infinitive, but usually only by examples. DCDuring (talk) 14:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Welcome back
Latest comment: 11 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Latest comment: 10 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hi, in regards to your ping, in general empty parameters don't do anything and are treated the same as missing parameters; this is a feature of Module:parameters and is related to the fact that empty parameters automatically get generated if you try to forward a parameter from one template to another and the parameter is missing in the first template. As a result, most templates are consistent in using - to suppress whatever needs suppressing. Benwing2 (talk) 16:54, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
You removed my uploads to Wiktionary because you’re “strongly opposed to synthesized audio”. Those recordings are of my actual voice. What the hell is wrong with you? JapanYoshi (talk) 10:14, 6 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sometimes it just adds up really quick. I don't mind the occasional, but I'd prefer it on more "impactful" pages if I have a say in the matter. Vininn126 (talk) 16:38, 3 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Davi6596: User:Fytcha/Sources has not been voted on yet. I don't really feel like working on policy at the moment so I'm not going to start my vote in the foreseeable future. If you do want to propose something in this direction, please write your own vote instead of using mine. — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 02:35, 5 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Congrats
Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Fytcha,
if the discussions of RfD for those topics are still on-going (I must have been unable to find them when I made the edits you reverted), then I would appreciate your inclusion of a link to the same, so I can be a part of that discussion.