Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:Wikisaurus. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:Wikisaurus, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:Wikisaurus in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:Wikisaurus you have here. The definition of the word Talk:Wikisaurus will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:Wikisaurus, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Wikisaurus sounds like a dinosaur
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There needs to be content here or, at minimum, a redirect. It's obvious that the root of Wikisaurus:toilet should be ] and Wiktionary:Wikisaurus is an utterly bizarre kludge.
If the objection is that this is an entry namespace, then create an article on the proper noun but fer chrissakes stop deleting useful information. — LlywelynII04:07, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
It is questionable whether this mainspace to Wikisaurus redirect should have been created. Now that the project is called Thesaurus, it should be deleted anyway. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:51, 19 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
Delete. This is a classic bad redirect — though we may not have an entry now, we could in the future, and there are a couple citations (though for what seem to be different senses) in durably archived media already. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds05:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
Delete. The mainspace is for dictionary content exclusively. Now that it's called Thesaurus, it should be mostly forgotten (except for historical purposes, I guess) that it was ever called Wikisaurus. The fact that the term "Wikisaurus" is even here sort of at first deceived me into thinking it might actually have an entry, and then after pressing Enter found out it wasn't. I don't think there's a good reason to include this. PseudoSkull (talk) 05:08, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply