Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:die Arme in die Hüften gestemmt. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:die Arme in die Hüften gestemmt, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:die Arme in die Hüften gestemmt in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:die Arme in die Hüften gestemmt you have here. The definition of the word Talk:die Arme in die Hüften gestemmt will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:die Arme in die Hüften gestemmt, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Just because English has "akimbo", doesn't mean that German "die Arme in die Hüfte gestemmt" is necessarily a term. The verb "die Arme in die Hüfte stemmen" should be the lemma (if there should be a lemma at all). — This unsigned comment was added by 84.188.177.183 (talk).
The gloss is wrong, Akimbo means "mit verschrenkten Armen". Being slightly tired, and not used to the phrase, I had first read Armee and couldn't figure the meaning, so I figure it's slightly idiomatic, hard to translate, too, and probably doesn' work with many other verbs or appendages. weak keep. 109.41.0.19905:43, 13 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Keep deleted. This forum is on the brink of being too big thanks to an unnecessary influx of undeletion requests. I have half a mind Dentonius to block you for a month from adding additional requests, just to give us a chance to close some of these requests, but I'll ask you first – nicely – to refrain from adding any more.--Robbie SWE (talk) 20:36, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Robbie, please don't turn en.wikt into ro.wikt where only you (and I) participate. On what basis would you block me for requesting undeletions? Would you prefer it if I requested deletions? — Dentonius20:40, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
But in all seriousness, Why are you threatening me, Robbie SWE? Admins are supposed to favour discussion instead of using their big buttons. If you don't mind daily deletions, why do you mind undeletions? — Dentonius20:48, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Individually, your requests are reasonable. Collectively, they're a burden. Basically, you're doubling the workload by doing everything twice: once for real, and once to humor you. The more I see this, the more it looks like filibustering. How is reopening a debate that you know you will lose different from the US senators who read from the phone book to delay the vote on the Civil Rights Act in the 1964? Chuck Entz (talk) 21:21, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Chuck, I'm concerned about the threat I just received. Why has the admin threatened to block me? From my point of view, having seen how he operates on ro.wikt, I don't think of it as a joke. He's chased away just about everybody on ro.wikt. — Dentonius21:24, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Slander aside, I didn't say I wanted to block you from the project, just temporarily restrict you from adding more requests to this forum so we can allow due process. --Robbie SWE (talk) 21:27, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Okay, Robbie SWE. You win. You've scared me with your big buttons. Although I believe in undeleting useful terms in this dictionary. I can see that the prevailing atmosphere on en.wikt is deletionist. I'll hold off on undeletions for a while. Eventually, I'll add a few more from time to time (a few weeks from now, perhaps), but I'll restrict the frequency with which I add them to the forum. Pat yourself on the back. — Dentonius22:18, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I know this Vox. He placed a copyviolation on my page a long time ago. But, he was right back then. It taught me to be more careful and use the citing tools we have. So I'm actually happy about the positive side effect of what he did. However, this is something which strikes me as unfair. I'm not doing anything which breaks the rules. An admin's personal preferences shouldn't be a reason to block me or put me on hold or whatever euphemism was used. — Dentonius21:40, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
As I said above, if you repeat something that doesn't violate the rules enough times, it becomes disruptive by virtue of the sheer volume, and thus violates the rules. There's no rule against posting a few paragraphs to your talk page. However, if I do it several times a day, every day, for weeks, and restore everything when you try to archive it, that would be harassment- which is a violation of the rules. Chuck Entz (talk) 23:13, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
