Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:hold one's pee. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:hold one's pee, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:hold one's pee in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:hold one's pee you have here. The definition of the word Talk:hold one's pee will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:hold one's pee, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Are we talking about hold in one's hands or hold inside one's bowels? The fact that there's a significant ambiguity here must be acknowledged. The second one is nearly idiomatic. Purplebackpack8922:43, 18 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
That's just typical polysemy. We shouldn't have entries for "hold one's place" (as a bookmark does in a book), "hold me a table" etc. ad nauseam, simply because "hold" has multiple senses. It's culturally obvious that people don't shit in their hands. Equinox◑23:22, 18 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Being "culturally obvious" (or any other type of "obvious") isn't a reason for deletion, sorry. Keep. Oh, and create the other things you've suggested P.S.: You can hold shit in your hands without shitting directly into your hands. You can shit into something else and then pick it up. Purplebackpack8902:17, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
As established before, PBP would also vote keep on "brown leaf" (because "leaf" can be a book page), even though that's our canonical example of something meriting deletion. His illogical conclusions ought to be ignored as having no sound basis in reason and for outright contradicting our policies. Equinox◑03:31, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Just because you disagree with them doesn't make them illogical. What is so illogical about wanting more dictionary definitions to resolve ambiguities in language? I want an actual reason, not just some blind lock-stepping to a policy it's clear many people don't support. And, no, I shouldn't be ignored, I get as much say as you, Equinox. Purplebackpack8903:46, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Also, I'd like a diff for where I said "keep" to brown leaf specifically. I may have said "keep" to other things you consider to be SOP, but not that one in particular. Purplebackpack8903:50, 19 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Delete, but I think we need a new sense at hold to cover these, plus examples like "hold it" or "hold one's bladder" (perhaps even "hold one's liquor" or "hold one's breath", which also have the same connotations of controlling the body as it tries to expel something). Perhaps "To remain continent; to control a bodily function." I would say that having a dozen of these entries for all the synonyms of "pee" and "poop" doesn't help anyone. Smurrayinchester (talk) 23:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
