"loose" is also a transitive verb for release, untie, or detach, see loose at http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=loose
People don't get the adjective "these baggy pants are loose" confused with the verb "I don't want to lose my wallet", rather they get the rare verb form "loose the hounds so they can attack the intruder" confused.
(Sorry, I don't know how to make a Wiktionary definition for multiple forms or I'd add this myself.)
Skierpage 04:44, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
This definition is out of whack. There's definite confusion in the description about what "lose" is and what "loose" is.
Loose means not restrained, or contained. Lose means to no longer keep track of.
The entry for loose seems copied from the entry for lose. Middle English word for loose was "louse" (Old Norse "lauss"), not as for "lose": middle English "losen", from old English "losian",
Nathan 8 August 2006
I agree, looking through the article history, it looks like 69.178.90.247 ignored the usage note and copied over the article for "lose". I'm not sure what's been added that's relevant to the proper usage, but perhaps it would be best to revert to the last edit before August 3rd? Something needs to be done about sorting through this mess; Unfortunately I'm a little too new to wiki to feel confident mucking about with major changes.
Gravillian 24 August 2006
I repeatedly see the word "loose" used with the exact same meaning as "lose," as in, to be defeated. At first I thought it must just be a typo but I've seen it so many times over and over that I really wonder if it must be some sort of alternate spelling. I have yet to find a single dictionary that says "to loose" means to be defeated. Is there some basis for this, or are people just that stupid? 72.178.131.225 02:34, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.
Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.
The poker definitions "A player who plays many hands" and "A strategy which involves playing many hands" define nouns, but this they are in the adjective section. Are senses nouns or adjectives? — Paul G 10:08, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
In poker "loose" refers to the quality of the hands played rather than the quantity. In this sense "loose" might be considered synonymous with "optimistic".
I don't really want to put this under a new Etymology - but it doesn't really belong under the existing one. Perhaps a section ===Misspelling of lose=== ? Facts707 17:43, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
I exchanged loose for lose
in a loose manner; loosely (in combination): loose-fitting hang loose ⇒ informal chiefly us to behave in a relaxed, easy fashion Concise English Dictionary © HarperCollins Publishers
--Backinstadiums (talk) 17:27, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
transitive verb: to release somebody from an obligation or pressure transitive and intransitive verb: to fire an arrow, bullet, or other missile Microsoft® Encarta® 2009
--Backinstadiums (talk) 15:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
unloose reads un- + loose. What meaning of loose is used in that etymology? --Backinstadiums (talk) 09:42, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
OED includes it in the entry of loose (noun). Is this nominal meaning already included ? --Backinstadiums (talk) 17:23, 30 May 2021 (UTC)