Talk:multi-word
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:multi-word. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:multi-word, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:multi-word in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:multi-word you have here. The definition of the word Talk:multi-word will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:multi-word, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Sum of parts. Multi-(insert noun here) can be used to construct any adjective, and this does not add anything new semantically. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 08:51, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep without question. multiword is a variant spelling. Donnanz (talk) 10:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)Hm, didn't know we had that one. I suppose I can wait and see what other editors think about this one; would probably have to apply WT:COALMINE judgement though. And possibly result in this being labeled
{{alternative form of}}to softredirect to the other one. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 11:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- (edit conflict)Hm, didn't know we had that one. I suppose I can wait and see what other editors think about this one; would probably have to apply WT:COALMINE judgement though. And possibly result in this being labeled
- Keep per WT:COALMINE. — Ungoliant (falai) 11:30, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Don't keep per COALMINE but because of 'all words in all languages'. It's a single word, not two words linked with a hyphen. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:12, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- On that basis you would delete a sizeable chunk of Wiktionary. Would you delete words such as multi-ethnic because it doesn't meet your personal criteria? That spelling is listed by Oxford. There can be variations between American and British treatment of words, I find that words like this are more likely to be hyphenated in British English. Donnanz (talk) 14:11, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- I think you misunderstood: he's saying keep because of the other reason, not because of COALMINE. Chuck Entz (talk) 14:26, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- If I misunderstood, I was misled by the last sentence "It's a single word, not two words linked with a hyphen." Is it ambiguous? Donnanz (talk) 14:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- No, not saying it's ambiguous. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:21, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- On the off-chance you want to continue this, WT:CFI says all words in all languages. It also says they must be attested and idiomatic. Further down, it actually says "An expression is “idiomatic” if its full meaning cannot be easily derived from the meaning of its separate components." Debatably multi-word isn't an expression, it's a word, so this sentence doesn't apply. There are no criteria for what makes a word idiomatic or not. Ergo default to line #1 “all words in all languages” and this passes. Objections? Mglovesfun (talk) 20:20, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- No objections to closure. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 21:11, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- On the off-chance you want to continue this, WT:CFI says all words in all languages. It also says they must be attested and idiomatic. Further down, it actually says "An expression is “idiomatic” if its full meaning cannot be easily derived from the meaning of its separate components." Debatably multi-word isn't an expression, it's a word, so this sentence doesn't apply. There are no criteria for what makes a word idiomatic or not. Ergo default to line #1 “all words in all languages” and this passes. Objections? Mglovesfun (talk) 20:20, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- No, not saying it's ambiguous. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:21, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
- If I misunderstood, I was misled by the last sentence "It's a single word, not two words linked with a hyphen." Is it ambiguous? Donnanz (talk) 14:44, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- I think you misunderstood: he's saying keep because of the other reason, not because of COALMINE. Chuck Entz (talk) 14:26, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- On that basis you would delete a sizeable chunk of Wiktionary. Would you delete words such as multi-ethnic because it doesn't meet your personal criteria? That spelling is listed by Oxford. There can be variations between American and British treatment of words, I find that words like this are more likely to be hyphenated in British English. Donnanz (talk) 14:11, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Don't keep per COALMINE but because of 'all words in all languages'. It's a single word, not two words linked with a hyphen. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:12, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep without question. DAVilla 12:55, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Equinox ◑ 20:15, 3 January 2014 (UTC)