Talk:mundane

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Talk:mundane. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Talk:mundane, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Talk:mundane in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Talk:mundane you have here. The definition of the word Talk:mundane will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTalk:mundane, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

The following information has failed Wiktionary's verification process.

Failure to be verified means that insufficient eligible citations of this usage have been found, and the entry therefore does not meet Wiktionary inclusion criteria at the present time. We have archived here the disputed information, the verification discussion, and any documentation gathered so far, pending further evidence.
Do not re-add this information to the article without also submitting proof that it meets Wiktionary's criteria for inclusion.


# {{rfv-sense}} {{context|after “the”}} non-magical things
# {{rfv-sense}} {{context|] psychology|Pagan|Wiccan|after “the”}} the reinterpretation of any practice or knowledge system that reduces its spiritual, ritualistic, or magical value.

mundane

The noun sense here with two definitions I find most suspect. I doubt this is more than personal conjecture having originally been added in this edit. __meco 20:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

To sharpen distinctions, I have added a low-controversy noun sense and put rfv-sense tags next to two other senses, one of which is pagan/Wiccan/esoteric, the other of which purports to be ordinary, but has the word magic in it. It would be easy to argue that we don't need any noun sense because many (most?) adjectives can be used as nouns and that there is no distinct meaning to the valid noun senses. DCDuring 22:19, 2 December 2007 (UTC)Reply