Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Template talk:RQ:Shakespeare Love's Labour's Lost. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Template talk:RQ:Shakespeare Love's Labour's Lost, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Template talk:RQ:Shakespeare Love's Labour's Lost in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Template talk:RQ:Shakespeare Love's Labour's Lost you have here. The definition of the word
Template talk:RQ:Shakespeare Love's Labour's Lost will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Template talk:RQ:Shakespeare Love's Labour's Lost, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
- Discussion moved from User talk:Sgconlaw.
Also needs Roman numeral bit in act= and scene= VealSociedad (talk) 20:32, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
- @VealSociedad: I'm not sure what you mean. — SGconlaw (talk) 21:53, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
- You know, allow act=3, act=III or act=iii Notusbutthem (talk) 17:20, 19 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
- @Notusbutthem: It seems to be working fine:
c. 1595–1596 (date written), William Shakespeare, “Loues Labour’s Lost”, in Mr. William Shakespeares Comedies, Histories, & Tragedies (First Folio), London: Isaac Iaggard, and Ed Blount, published 1623, →OCLC, :
- — SGconlaw (talk) 17:52, 19 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
- Yep, it's OK, sorry. Probably was a screw-up on my part Notusbutthem (talk) 09:36, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply