User talk:Sgconlaw
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word User talk:Sgconlaw. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word User talk:Sgconlaw, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say User talk:Sgconlaw in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word User talk:Sgconlaw you have here. The definition of the word User talk:Sgconlaw will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofUser talk:Sgconlaw, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
 Archive |
|---|
| 2014–2019 · 2020–2024 |
Signing posts
IP address learned to sign posts 90.167.163.65 11:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
- OK, thank you. — Sgconlaw (talk) 11:33, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
WOTD audio
Please tag future WOTDs with {{rfap}}. This way our entries can be even more complete before they're highlighted. PS love what you're doing. Father of minus 2 (talk) 22:42, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Father of minus 2: sure, no problem. — Sgconlaw (talk) 22:45, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Template dude
- Discussion moved to Template talk:RQ:Yeats Sophocles' King Oedipus.
The Wayback Machine link in aprimorate
- Discussion moved to Talk:aprimorate.
QWERTY -- WOTD nom
Hi SGC. Meant as a joke entry. Thought you might leave it there for a short while. Then again, it wasn't exactly hilarious, was it! -- Keep up the good work. -- ALGRIF talk 05:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Algrif: oh, it was meant to be a joke? Erm, OK. You've kind of missed April Fools' Day by a month … — Sgconlaw (talk) 12:50, 1 May 2025 (UTC)
FWOTD fallback
Hi, thanks for setting up FWOTD fallbacks. I wonder if the pages should still have a {{was fwotd}} template. I see that бууз (buuz), for example, doesn't have that template. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 17:37, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Justinrleung: hmmm, I guess maybe we should add
{{was fwotd}}to indicate the first time the entry has publicly appeared as FWOTD. I was just wondering if it made sense to use this template because FWOTD fallbacks do not appear on a specific date—rather, they will appear on the same day each year if no specific FWOTD for that day is set. But it makes sense to use{{was fwotd}}so editors know that an entry has already been used. — Sgconlaw (talk) 19:07, 23 May 2025 (UTC)- Yeah, I was thinking the same. It would be good to indicate the first appearance. — justin(r)leung { (t...) | c=› } 14:05, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Justinrleung: by the way, please help to suggest FWOTD fallbacks for upcoming dates in June—see "Wiktionary:Beer parlour/2025/May#Suggestions for FWOTD fallbacks for June dates". — Sgconlaw (talk) 19:55, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
buckaroo
- Discussion moved to Talk:buckaroo.
- Discussion moved to Template talk:RQ:Withycombe Christian Names.