Template talk:User translator

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Template talk:User translator. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Template talk:User translator, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Template talk:User translator in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Template talk:User translator you have here. The definition of the word Template talk:User translator will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTemplate talk:User translator, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process.

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


(originally listed with {{irc-invitation}} below)

Both unused. The former is basically a userbox, which we discourage ... and is only used by two userpages as well. L☺g☺maniac 23:24, 26 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

irc-invitation looks pretty useless as I think you can write a better invitation by hand. For User translator, I'm not against it but I believe that other people are. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:17, 27 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Keep. Used by User:Eirikr & User:Kitty53. I believe this is "allowed" because it deals with language proficiency. Similar to {{User en-6}} which was kept. --Bequw¢τ 00:56, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
I have strong reasons to believe that its use on one of those pages is misleading, and would delete this as an "explicitly forbidden" userbox. Conrad.Irwin 11:46, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
At least it should be modified to look more like a Babel box and less like a Wikipedia userbox. L☺g☺maniac 14:26, 30 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Switch to delete. — This unsigned comment was added by Bequw (talkcontribs).
Deleted for consistency. We don't allow other non-language tempalates. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:52, 2 February 2010 (UTC)Reply