Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Template talk:be-adj1. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Template talk:be-adj1, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Template talk:be-adj1 in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Template talk:be-adj1 you have here. The definition of the word Template talk:be-adj1 will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTemplate talk:be-adj1, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
The new template is kind of misnamed though. Generally, the templates named -table are the ones that contain the table, to which other templates supply the information to fill it in. It does not normally contain any grammar logic. —CodeCat16:18, 26 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
That's an arbitrary rule though, it makes sense both ways, but happens to go against your personal naming convention. The reason for my naming scheme is that I named them the same way I named the Russian noun template, and when I named the Russian noun template, Template:ru-decl-noun already existed, containing tables, so the first thing I thought of for the automatic declension table was Template:ru-noun-table. Then I named the Russian adjective template the same way, and now I used the same scheme for Ukrainian and Belarusian. --WikiTiki8916:55, 26 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
It's arbitrary and it did start off as my own personal convention, but I do think it's still sensible to follow it. And it's better to give the template the right name before it becomes widely used. —CodeCat17:07, 26 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Who else has followed your convention? I honestly don't mind switching them (it is arbitrary, after all) as long as the Russian templates are switched as well, but the Russian ones are widely used. --WikiTiki8917:50, 26 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
I thought we had a module for Russian already? We probably don't need the template anymore then. And I don't know who else followed the convention, that would be up to those who followed it to say? —CodeCat17:57, 26 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Searching for "Template:table" gives templates I created, but also quite a few created by others from what I can see. —CodeCat17:58, 26 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
No wonder I'm confused. We have two or three entirely separate methods for making Russian inflection tables. I thought that when the module was created, the existing templates were changed to use it. But that wasn't done for some reason and an entirely new parallel template was created. We should probably try to sort that out by deleting what we no longer need, and merging/renaming what we want to keep.
I was going to propose deleting the old non-module templates for Russian right after this, but I thought I might as well get the easy stuff over with first. --WikiTiki8918:54, 26 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
