Template talk:semantic loan
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Template talk:semantic loan. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Template talk:semantic loan, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Template talk:semantic loan in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Template talk:semantic loan you have here. The definition of the word Template talk:semantic loan will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTemplate talk:semantic loan, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
RFM discussion: January 2018–May 2020
The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for moves, mergers and splits (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Should we perhaps rename these to match Template:borrowed? At the very least I suggest that {{sl}} is renamed to {{sbor}}. —Rua (mew) 21:22, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
- I was thinking about this. I know we went down the other route already, but I'd prefer we use nouns for all of them; I feel it makes more sense on a conceptual point of view.
- We'd keep these as is (or
{{semantic loan}}>{{semantic borrowing}}? Is that used?), and change those:{{borrowed}}>{{borrowing}}{{inherited}}>{{inheritance}}(that sounds rather clumsy though){{derived}}>{{derivation}}
{{learnedly borrowed}}sounds clumsy;{{semantically loaned}}(or{{semantically borrowed}}?) and{{calqued}}are passable.- And we have
{{back-formation}},{{cognate}}, etc. --Per utramque cavernam (talk) 21:40, 7 January 2018 (UTC)- If we must have consistency, I think it would be less confusing for them all to be nouns rather than all adjectives, so we should move
{{borrowed}}to{{borrowing}},{{derived}}to{{derivation}}, and{{inherited}}to{{inheritance}}. However, I actually don't see that consistency is required here; I find nothing wrong with having some of our Foreign derivation templates being adjectives and others being nouns. —Mahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 11:40, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- If we must have consistency, I think it would be less confusing for them all to be nouns rather than all adjectives, so we should move
- Not moved. User:Per utramque cavernam, feel free to propose moving the other templates to nounal titles if you feel consistency is desirable. - -sche (discuss) 17:28, 3 May 2020 (UTC)