Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Template talk:surface analysis. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Template talk:surface analysis, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Template talk:surface analysis in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Template talk:surface analysis you have here. The definition of the word Template talk:surface analysis will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTemplate talk:surface analysis, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
An unilateral decision to create a template in a bid to standardise the wording is unfair. It’s up to the user whether to write ‘equivalent to’ or ‘synchronically analyzable as’ or ‘surface analysis as’ or ‘synchronically’, etc. If standardisation is desired, then a BP discussion has to be started first, and community consensus is required: given that this will affect all etymologies. Pinging @Mahagaja, PUC, Thadh. ·~dictátor·mundꟾ12:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Inqilābī: 'standardisation' in the comment above does not refer to any compulsion or unilateral decision to use one specific wording. 'standardisation' simply means making whatever wording is desired to be displayed without having to type it out manually every time. Perhaps the template could accommodate for more than one wording. If such a template is kept, it should still be up to the user whether or not it should be used. Kutchkutch (talk) 13:07, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Comment: Surface analyses are a tricky thing and we're not even all on the same page whether we want them in etymologies, let alone what the wording should be. I think this template should've been discussed first, but I'm not against the template itself per se. Thadh (talk) 13:27, 9 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Inqilābī Very clever.! It is misuse according to you. Even in that discussion Kutchkutch and AryamanA are actually not saying to remove them, and Kutchkutch IS adding them, see diff. but you won't dare object to Kutchkutch and would only accuse me. DO NOT BRING OFF-TOPIC discussions here, our debate regarding surface analysis of tatsamas is irrelevant here. Svartava2 (talk) 04:24, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
@victar: If I remember correctly, I have seen you changing other wordings to ‘equivalent to’: but please do not do so, let the wording used by the original editor be kept; there is no need to standardise it. ·~dictátor·mundꟾ07:42, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
'Weak keep; the wording may be clunky but the idea of a consistent, machine-parseable template for this is good and was requested by someone working to extract/reuse Wiktionary content Wiktionary:Beer parlour/2021/August#Morphology_section. A template would also allow people to customize what wording is displays to them, like the display of "{{,}}" or a few other templates can be user-customized. - -sche(discuss)08:52, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Abstain for now. I oppose standardization via imposition of a template. If somebody would rather type {{surface analysis}} than surface analysis that much seems harmless. Don't go changing existing pages to enforce a particular style. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 13:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
I'm uncertain about the exact implementation and style of this template and it may be that its creation cannot be justified on grounds of standardizing the wording alone, I don't know. However the point brought up by -sche about parsability is really good. Compare e.g. testen, verklagen, verladen, verhungern, verlaufen. Fytcha (talk) 10:07, 30 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Showing the keep before the delete votes is common, and one can just count the votes for themselves. Added the percentage of keep votes in my earlier comment. —Svārtava13:55, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
