Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Template talk:tnv. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Template talk:tnv, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Template talk:tnv in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Template talk:tnv you have here. The definition of the word Template talk:tnv will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofTemplate talk:tnv, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
To quote Ethnologue, "90% intelligibility of Chakma ". Looks like a dialect to me; I can't get any data on whether it's written in the same idiosyncratic script, though. If not, it might be easier in the future to separate them. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds05:02, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Are you proposing deletion of the template only or a change in how we treat the lect? If the former, how would that work technically? And if the latter, it should be in the BP, not here. (Same for Shelta, above.)—msh210℠ (talk) 17:38, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
A dedicated page for "Requests to change the treatment of lects" might be useful... I have noticed that our discussions are spread out across three pages. When I want to merge lects+codes+templates, I usually post on WT:RFM (the page for merging things), which there's precedent for. Metaknowledge posts here on WT:RFDO (the page for deleting templates), which there's precedent for. On occasion, people post in the BP. The majority of discussions take place on WT:RFM, in part because I am the most prolific starter of them. - -sche(discuss)20:12, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
