Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
User:ThirdPersBot/approval archive. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
User:ThirdPersBot/approval archive, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
User:ThirdPersBot/approval archive in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
User:ThirdPersBot/approval archive you have here. The definition of the word
User:ThirdPersBot/approval archive will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
User:ThirdPersBot/approval archive, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Request for bot status: ThirdPersonBot
- Bot: User: ThirdPersBot
- Owner/operator: User: Connel MacKenzie
- Purpose: Fill in third person verb forms, exactly as is currently done manually.
- Generation restrictions:
- Entry must not already exist.
- Root form must link the 3rd person form one or two lines after the ===Verb=== heading.
- Inflection can be provided by regular text wikification, or any other template that wikifies terms, including Uncle G's inflection templates as well as Ncik's templates (or any others!)
- All but the last
three two characters of the root form must match the plural form to be auto-generatred in this manner.
- Auto-generated only if there is no other inflected form (e.g. any adjective or noun inflection).
- ===Verb=== header of root term must be within an ==English== language section.
- VOTE:
- Comments:
- I would prefer that the headers of the created pages use ===Verb form=== rather than simply "Verb". This makes it clearer that mnore information will be found in a main entry. --EncycloPetey 23:39, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- Spelling rules as above. Also as above, should not have a noun sense, as that would imply both plural and verb inflection. I know there was some opposition at first, but I think you went overboard by dividing these tasks so finely. Davilla 03:02, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- See "Generation rules #5" - yes, if there is a noun form, it is excluded. I don't think I went overboard dividing the tasks. This is the identical subdivision I had when I first proposed it and Ec unilaterally denied the entire request specifying that each sub-task needed separate approval. I think that is very illogical, but it has had the side benefit of separating the flamewars to only the sub-components generating controversy (i.e. redirects and translations.) --Connel MacKenzie T C 03:45, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
I request that en:wikt:User: ThirdPersBot gets bot flag on the English Wiktionary:
Thank you. --Connel MacKenzie 01:34, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Done Jon Harald Søby 12:01, 15 April 2006 (UTC)