Hello! I think it would be a lot easier if you made this into a module instead, like Module:hi-IPA. —suzukaze (t・c) 23:13, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi. It seems like you've been adding stuff related to your own conlang, which unfortunately doesn't meet our Criteria for Inclusion. —suzukaze (t・c) 03:34, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
I’m not. Yay! Учхљёная (talk) 17:04, 18 March 2018 (UTC) Учхљёная (talk) 17:04, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
If you continue to a) revert changes made by other users in relation to the doubted veracity of your edits without discussing it first or b) add any more content that is made up, you will be blocked. This applies equally to edits made under the account User:Учхљёнэя. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 03:37, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
You have already been warned when it comes to contributing in languages you don't know as well as reverting changes "made by other users in relation to the doubted veracity of your edits without discussing it first". The edit on daleko is wrong in not one but three distinct ways; ダレコ is romanized dareko, not daleko; it is not the correct transliteration of Dalek and isn't used at all for any Japanese words but only for transliterating Slavic languages. As for Amdo Tibetan, amdotiibet is the translation to use, but Tibetan languages are not often discussed in Finnish. The Internationale translation you added despite it being reverted several times is in turn completely unsourced and unlikely to even exist. SURJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 14:01, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Well, can you support that by finding any recent citations at all? Equinox ◑ 02:08, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent contributions. I noticed that you've been adding many terms in several languages lately, particularly in Dzongkha, Adyghe, and in Proto-Altaic. But I'm curious of where you're getting the information from; whether from (an)other external source(s) or from your knowledge of the languages. Are you proficient in these languages? And what languages other than English do you have (some) command of? Just wondering!
P.S.: I would also suggest including a language babel on your user page. Thanks!
Sincerely,
2605:3E80:1200:10:0:0:0:6C79 01:16, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi. According to this, you are a "certified genius". Is that really true or is that just an unproven claim by a random IP? I don't know if that's true or not, but I've also read somewhere that you're simultaneously a chemist and high school student? 93.84.114.193 14:20, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Please don't indiscriminately add translations in languages you don't know (on which subject, consider adding {{Babel}} or some other indication of your language proficiencies to your user page): see diff. The form you added was SOP. (Populating translation tables by just adding all Wikipedia equivalents is generally a bad idea anyway, unless you verify that the form used by Wikipedia is indeed the one in common, attested use - WT:ATTEST also applies to translation tables.) — Mnemosientje (t · c) 11:30, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello. You reverted my edit to *slimbaz. Did you intend to do so ? Leasnam (talk) 23:01, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Reverting people's edits in modules is a very bad idea because cascading edits can cause modules errors. Those etym-only codes were added by me yesterday, while I'm working with other editors to improve the Turkic tree. If you have concerns about people's edits to modules, ask them on their talk page. --{{victar|talk}} 02:45, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
{{victar|talk}} 02:48, 5 March 2019 (UTC)If you move a page and the redirect shouldn't exist, please tag it with {{delete}} for speedy deletion. Ultimateria (talk) 17:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
"ole" is the code for "Olekha", please fix your entries. DTLHS (talk) 22:00, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
@Chuck Entz: Since I was about to do it before you blocked me, could you please add an apostrophe before "meyer" in the head-transliteration on རྒིལ་འག་སྨེ་ཡེར, so that it looks like "gilga-'meyer"? Much thanks! -/ut͡ʃxʎørnɛja ☭/ (탁ᷞ, кон-, ឯឌឹត្ស, 𐎛𐎓𐎄𐎛𐎚𐎒). 21:48, 12 May 2019 (UTC).
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Учхљёная,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wiktionary and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 14:34, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Учхљёная,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 19:14, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Share your experience in this survey
Hi Учхљёная,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 17:04, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
I'm just going to revert you every time you change Dzongkha transliterations to the Van Driem system. If you want to change it, then you can get consensus at the WT:Beer parlour and write a module which implements this automatically. What you will not do is manually disable transliterations and then write them in next to the links, because it's (a) completely impossible to maintain in a reasonable way, (b) not something anyone else has agreed to, and (c) obviously trying to circumvent consensus, even though you've known for a long time that we don't use that system. This is not the first time you’ve done this, and you've been blocked for doing things like this before. Theknightwho (talk) 23:07, 22 February 2024 (UTC)