User talk:Anomalocaris

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word User talk:Anomalocaris. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word User talk:Anomalocaris, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say User talk:Anomalocaris in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word User talk:Anomalocaris you have here. The definition of the word User talk:Anomalocaris will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofUser talk:Anomalocaris, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Formatting

Sorry for my copypasta. The tags are used to render certain text non-italic in an otherwise italic context. Your change resulted in all the text appearing in italics, which is visually confusing. Hope that helps explain the markup. Eirikr (talk) 03:22, 29 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Eirikr: I re-edited these pages using double-apostrophe markup for italics, which restored the lint error fixes I had done before, and also correcting many headings in spurious italics. Hopefully my edits didn't cause any new problems. Also, I recommend that you sign talk page comments with your user id and a link to your talk page. That's why I added those links in your comment above. Anomalocaris (talk) 10:48, 29 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
Re: signature, apologies, I had intended to sign, but apparently fat-fingered and got too many ~s, producing just the date-time. (Dunno why that's even a "feature", it's not terribly useful and just causes problems in my experience...)
Re: '', that doesn't do anything visually (copied from the rendered HTML and minimally munged for illustration):

(i, formerly wi, there is)

As you can see above, the parenthesized comment is entirely in italics. This is not desired. The word "formerly" should be non-italicized, as it is not part of the reading. That's what the previous markup does did.
AFAIK, the {{compound}} and {{m}} templates have never respected '' in the values supplied to the tr parameter, which is why various editors, including myself, have sometimes resorted to using <i> tags.
I'm afraid your change doesn't fix things either, but digging into the details, it appears that the underlying modules have changed recently, affecting how the {{compound}} and {{m}} templates behave, producing all these lint errors and altering the behavior. I've had a go at the markup myself now, but it appears that the underlying modules strip out markup in odd ways, so I've only committed minimal changes outside of the template arguments. I've started a GP thread about this at Wiktionary:Grease_pit/2018/May#Change_in_behavior_of_various_templates_in_handling_of_"tr"_values_--_formatting_no_longer_respected.
‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │Tala við mig 16:34, 29 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

thanks from Sarri

Thank you @Anomalocaris for all your corrections (diff) at my userpages and your effort to teach new Users how to write! (at my age, I am a bit slow, but I'll follow your corrections). But I don't like <code><nowiki> because I saw that it changes the fonts. I hope you will forgive me for not using it -just at my userpages-. And thank you, for showing me how to make black links:) I was wondering for some while. I made notes of your advice. sarri.greek (talk) 12:24, 5 July 2018 (UTC)Reply