User talk:Benwing2/proto-slavic-glagolitic-errors

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word User talk:Benwing2/proto-slavic-glagolitic-errors. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word User talk:Benwing2/proto-slavic-glagolitic-errors, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say User talk:Benwing2/proto-slavic-glagolitic-errors in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word User talk:Benwing2/proto-slavic-glagolitic-errors you have here. The definition of the word User talk:Benwing2/proto-slavic-glagolitic-errors will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofUser talk:Benwing2/proto-slavic-glagolitic-errors, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

@CodeCat, Useigor, Ivan Štambuk, Atitarev, Wikitiki89, Cinemantique, Wanjuscha, KoreanQuoter Can some of you who know Glagolitic take a look at the possible errors identified on this page? These are cases where the manual translit doesn't match the automatic one. They may be errors in the Glagolitic. Benwing2 (talk) 08:05, 27 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

@JohnC5 Benwing2 (talk) 08:08, 27 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Benwing2: I have little knowledge. Judging by Wikipedia, (Ⱏ/Ⱐ)(Ⰹ/Ⰺ/Ⰻ) = Ы (Y), = Ѣ () but also (Ja), ? = Ѥ (Je), Ⱆ is uk and uk is (U) = (О)(У/Ѵ).
Therefore possible mistakes: page 10 (ⱑ tr=a), page 710 (ⰑⰖ tr=u), page 849 (ⰹ tr=ĭ), page 852 (ⱑ tr=je), page 1082 (ⱑ tr=je). —Игорь Тълкачь (talk) 07:13, 28 January 2017 (UTC)Reply