Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
User talk:Java Beauty. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
User talk:Java Beauty, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
User talk:Java Beauty in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
User talk:Java Beauty you have here. The definition of the word
User talk:Java Beauty will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
User talk:Java Beauty, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
It looks like that quote for "enactings" does exist here , in this book from 1824. Guitarmankev1 (talk) 13:48, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
- Sweet, thanks in advance for adding it. Well found! --Java Beauty (talk) 13:49, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
- I'm a little unfamiliar with the formatting for quotations, but I did my best. Feel free to clean it up if you see fit. Guitarmankev1 (talk) 13:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
- Two Wonderfools cannot converse with each other, so I guess this guy is your godson? — inqilābī 16:45, 20 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
- This guy is my gardener, actually. --Java Beauty (talk) 08:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
- NO I WAS MISTAKEN. I can hardly believe mine eyen, but here I see two WFs talking with each other, and at one post even one nominating the other for admin.ship! — inqilābī 19:53, 24 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
- What is the maximum number (assuming > 2) of WFs that have held a discussion, and where? — inqilābī 14:01, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
- So the maximum number is 2, right? Or you simply do not remember if the number ever exceeded 2 in any discussion? — inqilābī 14:22, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hello, you might be interested in this. The etymology of your all-time name, Wonderfool, is missing, so you might want to add it. Thanks! — inqilābī 14:31, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
- WF already did it. And changed the etymology about 6 times. --Java Beauty (talk) 14:36, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
What, six etymologies for the name "Wonderfool"? But what you already did?— still marked as unknown there. Feel free to add it yourself. — inqilābī 14:44, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
- You can find it in the page history if you really want. Or wait for the posthumous publication of The Miscellanies of the late great Wonderfool, or Severaull of their Lexicographicall Follies, collated for the first time by PseudoSkull --Java Beauty (talk) 14:48, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
- Oh! I misunderstood your comment. I have added your etymology now. By the way, at least mention the name of Wiktionary in the title of that treatise, since all your lexicographical exploits have been done on WT! — inqilābī 15:33, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
What is CV? But OED will spurn you out if you do Wonderfoolery there. And, who will overlook your main page exploits, your biographer or the OED? — inqilābī 15:43, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Oh there was no need to hyperlink the term! I am not foolish: I also looked it up, but could not understand which CV you meant— there are so many meanings... Well, I have another question: since your later OED exploits will also be included in that treatise, how can PseudoSkull write the book, as they, like any other editor here, know only about your WT life.
- Furthermore, also ensure that another book relating to your real life is published, under the name: The Pusillanimous Escapades of the Late Great Wonderfool; Or, His Criminall Activities in Britain, His Fleeyinge into Exile in Spain, & His Elopement with an Asturiana away unto Shangri-La— collated for the first time by Guitarmankev1. — inqilābī 21:36, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
- I'm quite confused how I keep getting brought up in these discussions... – Guitarmankev1 (talk) 18:51, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
- @Guitarmankev1: Hey, that's because Wonderfool claimed (in the above post) that you are his gardener. Do you really have connexions with him, or was he joking? But at any rate I apologize should this have irked you. — inqilābī 19:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
- @Inqilābī: lol I'm not irked or anything, no need to apologize. I recall that elsewhere Mr Blotto himself asked if I was a WF alt, I just wonder what I did to make him think that. And if I ever planted WF's petunias, I certainly wasn't aware of who he was at the time.
- Also, it looks like you have a typo in your signature's contributions link, which directs to the contributions of the user "Iqnilābī". – Guitarmankev1 (talk) 23:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
- @Guitarmankev1: But what's more intriguing is WF's initial reply to SemperBlotto's asking, & his subsequent alteration of his original reply with a blatant edit summary. And no, there's no typo. in my signature's link: the metathesis was accidentally introduced by you, actually. But take no worries, mistakings happen... — inqilābī 20:42, 29 September 2020 (UTC)Reply