Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2010-07/User:NadandoBot for bot status

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2010-07/User:NadandoBot for bot status. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2010-07/User:NadandoBot for bot status, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2010-07/User:NadandoBot for bot status in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2010-07/User:NadandoBot for bot status you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2010-07/User:NadandoBot for bot status will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/bt-2010-07/User:NadandoBot for bot status, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

User:NadandoBot for bot status

  • Nomination: I hereby request the Bot flag for User:NadandoBot for the following purposes:
    The repair of broken links in {{form of}}, due to this edit by Msh210.
  • Before:
  • After:
  • Vote ends: 23:59 31 July 2010 (UTC)
  • Vote started: 16:23, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support Thryduulf (talk) 18:01, 24 July 2010 (UTC) but much prefer the simpler, {{term}}-like structure + {{count page}} where needed suggested in the BP discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 18:01, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
    The simpler suggestion has now been adopted and the code above updated accordingly. Like msh below me, my support is now stronger than it was. Thryduulf (talk) 17:29, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
  2. Support, specifically I support Nadando running a Wiktionary bot as he's one of our best all round editors (meticulous, cool-headed, etc.) but I do support this specific clean up task too. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:11, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
  3. Support with many thanks to Nadando for proposing to do this task.​—msh210℠ (talk) 15:57, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
    The code above's been updated since I voted, but my support remains intact (is stronger if anything).​—msh210℠ (talk) 15:15, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
  4. Support Robert Ullmann 08:31, 27 July 2010 (UTC) but whyever isn't the "after":
    eh? isn't that the point of the "lang=fr" bit? That the verb/referred form doesn't need an explicit section link? (and as Thryduulf notes, let AF worry about "count page" if you happen to drop the last link in the entry) Robert Ullmann 08:31, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
    You're right, I don't know why I didn't before. Code is updated. Nadando 06:36, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
    Exactly, that's the format I used for my inflected forms. Mglovesfun (talk) 07:54, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
  5. Support Bequw → τ 03:04, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
  6. Support SemperBlotto 14:52, 29 July 2010 (UTC) - could it fix "past participle of" as well please.
  7. Support    AugPi 15:26, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
  9. Support Dan Polansky 06:56, 30 July 2010 (UTC) I support the after-form {{form of|First-person singular ]|abaisser|lang=fr}}; let AutoFormat worry about counting pages. I support Nanando running a bot. --Dan Polansky 06:56, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

Abstain

Decision

Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia