Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2011-12/User:KamikazeBot for bot status

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2011-12/User:KamikazeBot for bot status. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2011-12/User:KamikazeBot for bot status, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2011-12/User:KamikazeBot for bot status in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2011-12/User:KamikazeBot for bot status you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2011-12/User:KamikazeBot for bot status will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/bt-2011-12/User:KamikazeBot for bot status, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

User:KamikazeBot for bot status

  • Vote ends: 23:59 11 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Vote started: 11:17, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
  • Discussion:

Support

  1. Support —Stephen (Talk) 04:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. I really don't see why the user needs a bot flag to edit two entries.​—msh210℠ (talk) 19:45, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
    Obviously it is not two entries. Those two entries are already done. It is ridiculous to think he wants to use a bot to edit two entries that he has already finished with. If you don’t understand what his examples mean, why don’t you ask him? —Stephen (Talk) 08:25, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
  2. Oppose Dan Polansky 09:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC) I don't like this. The bot's purpose is likely to add interwiki links, but this is not explicitly stated in the vote. Furthermore, "first edit after update" referred to in the "Abstain" section below is one in Wikipedia. Moreover, this bot's name looks like the bot is about to destroy something while perishing itself in the process ;). We have Luckas-bot (talk • contribs) for interwiki, so we have no urgent need to add another bot for this. --Dan Polansky 09:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
    I have now noticed the failed vote Wiktionary:Votes/bt-2011-10/User:KamikazeBot for bot status, for the record. --Dan Polansky 09:34, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
    In that failed vote, there was only one vote. It doesn’t mean anything. On English Wikipedia, KamikazeBot seems to be making about 500 edits a day, about twice as many as Luckas-bot. —Stephen (Talk) 10:50, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Abstain

  2. Abstain : Luckas-bot (talk • contribs) is type r2.7.1, an updated version (right?). —AugPi 05:27, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Decision

Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia