Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2006-09/User:TheDaveRoss
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2006-09/User:TheDaveRoss. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2006-09/User:TheDaveRoss, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2006-09/User:TheDaveRoss in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2006-09/User:TheDaveRoss you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/cu-2006-09/User:TheDaveRoss will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/cu-2006-09/User:TheDaveRoss, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
- I hereby nominate User:TheDaveRoss as a local English Wiktionary Check User.
- Vote started by: --Connel MacKenzie 20:53, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- User:TheDaveRoss has shown considerable aptitude in molding the Wiktionary Check User policy page, request page, etc. As the most active CU on this English Wiktionary, I feel he would be a very good person to keep an eye on my activities, particularly to make sure I do not exceed the stated boundaries. In my opinion, User:TheDaveRoss possesses the technical knowledge to adequately perform the duties of a Check User. I am not voting support until the nomination is accepted. --Connel MacKenzie 20:53, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- Note to anyone who looks at this and thinks there is plenty of support already: CU policy means he needs 25 votes. Robert Ullmann 15:38, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Acceptance: It'd be a pleasure to further impose regulation on Connel, and maybe stem some vandalism along the way ;) - TheDaveRoss 02:42, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Support
SupportDAVilla 21:19, 13 October 2006 (UTC)You mean he's not already?Misread. Checkuser, yes, I agree DAVilla 21:21, 13 October 2006 (UTC)- Um, he hasn't accepted yet. --Connel MacKenzie 21:22, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well this is a bit humbling, twice now. DAVilla 21:29, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Support DAVilla 09:01, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- Um, he hasn't accepted yet. --Connel MacKenzie 21:22, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support Connel MacKenzie 02:53, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support Dvortygirl 05:04, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Enginear 08:35, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support —Stephen 08:46, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support Jonathan Webley 16:03, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Jeffqyzt 20:35, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Thogo (talk) 21:42, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support. :) bd2412 T 23:59, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support SemperBlotto 13:08, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support EncycloPetey 18:09, 19 October 2006 (UTC) --EncycloPetey 18:09, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- ––Pill δ 12:20, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support Werdna 06:32, 22 October 2006 (UTC) Fine. Werdna 06:32, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support Versageek 06:59, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support Robert Ullmann 15:38, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Dijan 06:23, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- Keffy 02:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support - let's curse him w/ Checkuser's screaming and fun -- Tawker 17:51, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Tohru 22:57, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support --GerardM 14:21, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support \Mike 08:30, 2 November 2006 (UTC) (didn't I vote already?)
- Support Leftmostcat 22:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Support Alhen 08:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Support Jon Harald Søby 20:12, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
- Support Kipmaster 13:06, 13 November 2006 (UTC) (sorry, didn't notice this vote before)
- Support Weed them out wor kid! --Williamsayers79 13:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Oppose
Abstain
Decision
- Thanks to those of you who voted for me, I'll submit a request to Meta later today. And I swear I am going to get less busy soon and be around more (Soon might be Christmas =/). - DaveRoss 18:16, 16 November 2006 (UTC)