Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-12/t template in WT:ELE. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-12/t template in WT:ELE, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-12/t template in WT:ELE in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-12/t template in WT:ELE you have here. The definition of the word
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-12/t template in WT:ELE will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-12/t template in WT:ELE, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
- Voting on: Changing WT:ELE to mention
{{t}}
in the ‘Translations’ section. It already is in Wiktionary:Translations. I think the template is sufficiently mature now to include it there. Since nobody reacted on the BP discussion, I already made this change, but it was subsequently reverted, claiming that a vote is needed. So here it is. I suggest to reinstall that version (please only comment on the change above, not on the one about the quotes).
- Vote ends: 23:59 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- Vote started: 0:00 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Support
Support -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 19:14, 4 January 2009 (UTC) The template is definitely mature, and my impression was that is was also widely supported. I agree with our policy document reflecting this.
Support EncycloPetey 19:28, 4 January 2009 (UTC) I agree about reinstating the specific change diff'd in the link for this vote. However, you should have noted that it also changes the inflection line to a template call. Also, the end of the first changed paragraph should say "double square brackets" instead of just "square brackets".
- I missed the template call, sorry. How to go with this, include it? ‘Double’ will be added. H. (talk) 13:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- For the template call, I'm fine either way, and if no one raises a fuss, then it's simply something to be noted but not fussed over. No one has made any comment about it since I pointed it out, so it's probably OK. --EncycloPetey 22:25, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Support —Stephen 20:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Support —RuakhTALK 22:09, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Support Nadando 22:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Support —Vahagn Petrosyan 01:02, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Support Conrad.Irwin 16:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Support assuming that this means that the translations section will revert to the version linked-to above, not that the entire page will.—msh210℠ 21:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Support Williamsayers79 08:17, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Support Bequw → ¢ • τ 08:46, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Support H. (talk) 13:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC) my own proposal, of course.
Support 50 Xylophone Players talk 00:23, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Support DAVilla 06:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Oppose
Abstain
Decision