Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-12/t template in WT:ELE

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-12/t template in WT:ELE. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-12/t template in WT:ELE, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-12/t template in WT:ELE in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-12/t template in WT:ELE you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-12/t template in WT:ELE will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-12/t template in WT:ELE, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Inclusion of {{t}} on WT:ELE

  • Voting on: Changing WT:ELE to mention {{t}} in the ‘Translations’ section. It already is in Wiktionary:Translations. I think the template is sufficiently mature now to include it there. Since nobody reacted on the BP discussion, I already made this change, but it was subsequently reverted, claiming that a vote is needed. So here it is. I suggest to reinstall that version (please only comment on the change above, not on the one about the quotes).
  • Vote ends: 23:59 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Vote started: 0:00 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support -Atelaes λάλει ἐμοί 19:14, 4 January 2009 (UTC) The template is definitely mature, and my impression was that is was also widely supported. I agree with our policy document reflecting this.
  2. Support EncycloPetey 19:28, 4 January 2009 (UTC) I agree about reinstating the specific change diff'd in the link for this vote. However, you should have noted that it also changes the inflection line to a template call. Also, the end of the first changed paragraph should say "double square brackets" instead of just "square brackets".
    I missed the template call, sorry. How to go with this, include it? ‘Double’ will be added. H. (talk) 13:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
    For the template call, I'm fine either way, and if no one raises a fuss, then it's simply something to be noted but not fussed over. No one has made any comment about it since I pointed it out, so it's probably OK. --EncycloPetey 22:25, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
  3. Support —Stephen 20:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  4. SupportRuakhTALK 22:09, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  5. Support Nadando 22:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
  6. SupportVahagn Petrosyan 01:02, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
  7. Support Conrad.Irwin 16:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
  8. Support assuming that this means that the translations section will revert to the version linked-to above, not that the entire page will.—msh210 21:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
  9. Support Williamsayers79 08:17, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  10. Support Bequw¢τ 08:46, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  11. Support H. (talk) 13:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC) my own proposal, of course.
  12. Support 50 Xylophone Players talk 00:23, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
  13. Support DAVilla 06:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

Abstain

Decision