Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-10/User:Nbarth for admin. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-10/User:Nbarth for admin, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-10/User:Nbarth for admin in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-10/User:Nbarth for admin you have here. The definition of the word
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-10/User:Nbarth for admin will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-10/User:Nbarth for admin, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
- Nomination: I hereby nominate User:Nbarth as a local English Wiktionary Administrator. Friendly, willing to learn and discuss. Tools could make him do what he's doing, only better (his words not mine) Rising Sun 19:44, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Vote starts: 00:00, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- Vote ends: 24:00, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
- Acceptance: I accept, thank you!
- Languages: en, fr, es-2, ja-1
- Timezone: UTC-8/UTC-7 (summer) (Pacific Time)
- —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 20:21, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- (contribs)
Support
- Support --RuakhTALK 00:00, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- Weak support: I haven't interacted with Nbarth, but the contributions look good. Equinox ◑ 21:49, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support. Have seen this user around a lot, always doing useful things. Kind of thought he was an admin. -- Visviva 00:06, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support Benevolent contributor, has done a lot of nice work on etymology-related guideline pages (WT:ETY, W:AJ/E etc.) --Ivan Štambuk 09:30, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support Very helpful. --Bequw → ¢ • τ 18:18, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support EncycloPetey 03:51, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support Yes. --Neskaya contribs – talk? 01:46, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support –blurpeace (talk) 03:23, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support Juliancolton 01:48, 23 October 2009 (UTC) - Seems good. Juliancolton 01:48, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 08:00, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support Volants 13:47, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- Support Seems solid. DCDuring TALK 23:23, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Oppose
Abstain
- Abstain While I haven't seen Nbarth in action for a while, I would have opposed at that point. A quick scan of contributions doesn't reveal many areas in which having extra tools would be useful; though that's always a chicken-and-egg problem. Conrad.Irwin 22:27, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- Abstain - doesn't ever seem to have repaired vandalism or done anything similar SemperBlotto 11:08, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
- Abstain per SemperBlotto. I cannot find that many instances in which having the extra tools would be beneficial to the English Wiktionary after quickly scanning this users' most recent contributions. Razorflame 18:51, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Decision