Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-10/User:Nbarth for admin

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-10/User:Nbarth for admin. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-10/User:Nbarth for admin, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-10/User:Nbarth for admin in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-10/User:Nbarth for admin you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-10/User:Nbarth for admin will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/sy-2009-10/User:Nbarth for admin, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

User:Nbarth for admin

Support

  1. Support --RuakhTALK 00:00, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
  2. Weak support: I haven't interacted with Nbarth, but the contributions look good. Equinox 21:49, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
  3. Support. Have seen this user around a lot, always doing useful things. Kind of thought he was an admin. -- Visviva 00:06, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
  4. Support Benevolent contributor, has done a lot of nice work on etymology-related guideline pages (WT:ETY, W:AJ/E etc.) --Ivan Štambuk 09:30, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
  5. Support Very helpful. --Bequw¢τ 18:18, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
  6. Support EncycloPetey 03:51, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
  7. Support Yes. --Neskaya contribstalk? 01:46, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
  8. Supportblurpeace (talk) 03:23, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
  9. Support Juliancolton 01:48, 23 October 2009 (UTC) - Seems good. Juliancolton 01:48, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
  10. Support The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 08:00, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
  11. Support Volants 13:47, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
  12. Support Seems solid. DCDuring TALK 23:23, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

Abstain

  1. Abstain While I haven't seen Nbarth in action for a while, I would have opposed at that point. A quick scan of contributions doesn't reveal many areas in which having extra tools would be useful; though that's always a chicken-and-egg problem. Conrad.Irwin 22:27, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
  2. Abstain - doesn't ever seem to have repaired vandalism or done anything similar SemperBlotto 11:08, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
  3. Abstain per SemperBlotto. I cannot find that many instances in which having the extra tools would be beneficial to the English Wiktionary after quickly scanning this users' most recent contributions. Razorflame 18:51, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Decision