Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-01/User:Bogorm for admin

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-01/User:Bogorm for admin. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-01/User:Bogorm for admin, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-01/User:Bogorm for admin in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-01/User:Bogorm for admin you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-01/User:Bogorm for admin will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-01/User:Bogorm for admin, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

User:Bogorm for admin

  • Nomination: I hereby nominate User:Bogorm as a local English Wiktionary Administrator. Bogorm was nominated over 6 months ago, a vote which failed (here). Since then, to his credit, he has not been put off, and has addressed many of the concerns raised – while also keeping up a steady stream of excellent work in Slavic languages. I believe he would make a good user of the extra buttons. Ƿidsiþ 12:14, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Vote starts: as soon as the nomination is accepted
  • Vote ends: 24:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Acceptance: I accept the nomination. The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 20:08, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
    • Languages: bg, en-3, de-4, ru-4, fr-3
    • Timezone: UTC+2

Support

  1. Support Ƿidsiþ 12:14, 15 January 2010 (UTC) As nominator.
  2. Support Razorflame 12:15, 15 January 2010 (UTC) Would make a great administrator! Razorflame 12:15, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
  3. Support --Stephen 13:22, 15 January 2010 (UTC) --Stephen 13:22, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
  4. Support Conrad.Irwin 13:24, 15 January 2010 (UTC) you aren't one?!
  5. Support Pharamp 13:28, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
  6. Support -- opiaterein -- 15:00, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
  7. Support Eivind (t) 15:01, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
  8. Support Caladon 20:11, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
  9. Support Prince Kassad 20:11, 15 January 2010 (UTC) see conrad
  10. Support Neskaya contribs – talk? 21:43, 15 January 2010 (UTC) With the best of luck and my well wishes, no less. Bogorm has made vast improvements, and would be a very good administrator now. --Neskaya contribs – talk? 21:43, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
  11. Support Maro 22:33, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
  12. Support I like Bulgarians. --Vahagn Petrosyan 23:08, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
  13. Support Bequw → ¢ • τ 00:09, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
  14. Support —Internoob (Disc.•Cont.) 02:40, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
  15. Support Daniel. 02:56, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
  16. Support —RuakhTALK 14:55, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
  17. Support While I still have some reservations, my honest opinion is that he will make a good admin, even if he doesn't see eye-to-eye with all of us. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:56, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
  18. Support † ﴾(u):Raifʻhār (t):Doremítzwr﴿ 05:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
  20. Support Ivan Štambuk 05:53, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
  21. Support I believe he will make a good admin. – Krun 13:34, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
  22. Support DAVilla 06:09, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
  23. Support.​—msh210℠ 16:10, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
  24. Support Leo Laursen – (talk · contribs) 13:03, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
  26. Support per Neskaya. DCDuring TALK 15:00, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

  2. Oppose Dan Polansky 10:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC) I am not yet comfortable with the rate of archaisms in Bogorm's speech. On the talk page of Bogorm, there is a section "Antecedent confabulations". Yes, I can guess what it means, but I have to guess; I would be able to guess even if it were in Chinese. In that section, there is "Auguſt-November 2008", with "ſ". The user page is full of "ſ": assuming the talk page is to be read by other people, it should be as readable as possible.

    I consider Bogorm a very valuable contributor, and I confirm that his discussion style has significantly improved since the last vote. It is the role of an admin that I am disputing, not the role of a contributor. --Dan Polansky 10:43, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

    He would make a far better administrator than many of our current administrators. Period. :) — opiaterein — 23:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Abstain

Decision

Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia