Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-03/User:CodeCat for admin
Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-03/User:CodeCat for admin. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-03/User:CodeCat for admin, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-03/User:CodeCat for admin in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-03/User:CodeCat for admin you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-03/User:CodeCat for admin will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/sy-2010-03/User:CodeCat for admin, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
User:CodeCat for admin
- Nomination: I hereby nominate CodeCat (talk • contribs) as a local English Wiktionary Administrator. Rising Sun talk? contributions 22:15, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Vote starts: 23:46, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Vote ends: 24:00, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Acceptance: I accept.
- Languages: en, nl, de-2, sv-1, fi-1, fr-1
- Timezone: UTC+1 / UTC+2 (CET/CEST)
Support
Support Yair rand 00:09, 26 March 2010 (UTC)- Support Equinox ◑ 21:10, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support —Internoob (Disc•Cont) 20:40, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support AugPi 20:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support Conrad.Irwin 22:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support even though I may be somewhat biased. -- Prince Kassad 21:32, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support Mglovesfun (talk) 09:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support —Stephen 02:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC) Even if he doesn’t patrol, the tools will help him do good work. —Stephen 02:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Oppose
Abstain
Abstain Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 08:14, 27 March 2010 (UTC) I absolutely love the work CodeCat does around here and it's also nice to have another Dutch editor fighting alongside of me. He's fully capable of taking on the admin position, but I don't want to impose the additional workload on him. So I shall abstain from voting. Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 08:14, 27 March 2010 (UTC)- Abstain Razorflame 22:07, 27 March 2010 (UTC) I, too, will abstain from voting because I do not know the work done by the user or the user in question, so I cannot, without any sort of bias, vote support or oppose for this candidate.
- Abstain - his acceptance was very lukewarm - I don't think he will ever actually patrol recent changes and/or fight vandalism. SemperBlotto 21:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- The fact he's a bot editor, if his bot goes wrong he can fix it much quicker by reverting/deleting. That was my primary (but not only) reason for supporting. Mglovesfun (talk) 21:40, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Decision
- Passes 8-0-3. --Yair rand 05:23, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Granted. --EncycloPetey 05:37, 11 April 2010 (UTC)