Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2011-01/User:Leasnam for admin. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2011-01/User:Leasnam for admin, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2011-01/User:Leasnam for admin in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2011-01/User:Leasnam for admin you have here. The definition of the word
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2011-01/User:Leasnam for admin will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2011-01/User:Leasnam for admin, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
- Nomination: I hereby nominate Leasnam (talk • contribs) as a local English Wiktionary Administrator. He's been very active and dedicated and he has been making a lot of good and accurate edits. —CodeCat 20:37, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
- Vote starts: as soon as the nomination is accepted
- Vote ends: 24:00, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
- Acceptance:
- Languages: en, ang-3, enm-2, es-2, de-2, fr-1, nl-1, sco-1, ko-1
- Timezone: UTC-5
- Leasnam 20:46, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Support
- Support Mglovesfun (talk) 20:59, 15 January 2011 (UTC). With a little caution. I think he has things to learn regarding Wiktionary norms, but I'm very encouraged by his ability to discuss rationally and listen to what people are saying on his talk page. He has good personal qualities. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:59, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support Ƿidsiþ 21:02, 15 January 2011 (UTC), as above. He is not totally there on the formatting but is willing to discuss and seems to have plenty to contribute. Ƿidsiþ 21:02, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support Downunder 21:26, 15 January 2011 (UTC) No new admins since April? That's not normal --Downunder 21:26, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support why not? -- Prince Kassad 21:31, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support per Mglovesfun and Ƿidsiþ. —RuakhTALK 22:48, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support Equinox ◑ 22:56, 15 January 2011 (UTC) He seems knowledgeable and I thought he was already an admin. Equinox ◑ 22:56, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support, but please don't use your new powers to spank User:Flibjib8. --Vahag 05:06, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- Seconded. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:59, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support per Widsith.—msh210℠ (talk) 05:20, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support —Internoob (Disc•Cont) 18:27, 16 January 2011 (UTC) Sure.
- Support per Mglovesfun and Widsidth. --Dan Polansky 14:52, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support —Stephen (Talk) 17:28, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 14:43, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support Leasnam 07:07, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Oppose
Abstain
- Abstain SemperBlotto 15:08, 21 January 2011 (UTC) - no evidence of proto-admin behaviour (countering vandalism etc.)
- Abstain Neskaya … gawonisgv? 18:21, 23 January 2011 (UTC) per SB. Maybe in a few months. --Neskaya … gawonisgv? 18:21, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Decision