Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2011-10/User:Angr for admin

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2011-10/User:Angr for admin. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2011-10/User:Angr for admin, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2011-10/User:Angr for admin in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2011-10/User:Angr for admin you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2011-10/User:Angr for admin will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary:Votes/sy-2011-10/User:Angr for admin, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

User:Angr for admin

  • Nomination: I hereby nominate Angr (talk • contribs) as a local English Wiktionary Administrator. He has been a contributor here for years, with high volumes of contributions to entries, to templates, and to discussions. Our coverage of, and infrastructure for, several languages would be much the poorer without him, and in discussions his comments are always relevant, level-headed, and to-the-point. —RuakhTALK 15:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Vote starts: as soon as the nomination is accepted
  • Vote ends: 24:00, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Acceptance:
    • Languages: en, de, fr, ga
    • Timezone: UTC+01 (UTC+02 during the EU's Summer Time)
    I accept the nomination with thanks. —Angr 15:56, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support SemperBlotto 15:59, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  2. Support.​—msh210℠ (talk) 16:09, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  3. Support Mglovesfun (talk) 16:13, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  4. Support. Don't be ridiculous, Angr has been an admin for years. bd2412 T 16:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
    I know, right? —RuakhTALK 17:24, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  5. Support —RuakhTALK 17:24, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  6. Support he wasn't? -- Liliana • 17:41, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  7. Support Dan Polansky 19:18, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  8. Support Equinox ◑ 19:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC) I didn't spot any vandal-fighting in the past month of his/her contributions, but there are good edits going back to 2005! Equinox ◑ 19:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
    I don't think vandal-fighting is a very important criterion in evaluating a prospective admin, especially since it's harder for a non-admin to engage in it (what with not being able to see which edits need patrolling). Rather, what matters is that the user be trustworthy, and represent the project well. Such a user, given the admin tools, will make good use of them, even if (s)he never once visits http://en.wiktionary.orghttps://dictious.com/en/Special:RecentChanges?hidepatrolled=1 nor http://en.wiktionary.orghttps://dictious.com/en/Special:NewPages?hidepatrolled=1. (Of course, it would be nice if admins visited those pages more often, but they're not the main reason to adminify someone.) —RuakhTALK 20:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
    It's true I don't go vandal-hunting either here or at the projects where I'm already an admin (Wikipedia, Wiksource, Commons), but I do revert vandalism when I spot it. —Angr 21:05, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  9. Support Ƿidsiþ 19:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
  10. Support —Internoob 22:26, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  11. Support The more the merrier. Jamesjiao → T ◊ C 02:50, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  13. Support DaveRoss 02:53, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
  14. Support --Anatoli 23:51, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
  15. Support Maro 19:36, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
  16. Support - -sche (discuss) 01:28, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
  17. Support —Stephen (Talk) 11:11, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
  18. Support EncycloPetey 03:05, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
  19. Support. DAVilla 07:06, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Oppose

Abstain

Decision

Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia