Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2016-11/User:Gamren for admin. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2016-11/User:Gamren for admin, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2016-11/User:Gamren for admin in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2016-11/User:Gamren for admin you have here. The definition of the word
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2016-11/User:Gamren for admin will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition of
Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2016-11/User:Gamren for admin, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
User:Gamren for admin
Nomination: I hereby nominate Gamren (talk • contribs) as a local English Wiktionary Administrator.
Schedule:
Acceptance: I accept. Thank you.__Gamren (talk) 10:22, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Languages: da-N, en-3, de-2
- Timezone: UTC+1, DST from April to October (ca.)
Support
- Support as nominator. Equinox ◑ 12:40, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support — Ungoliant (falai) 11:34, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support on the condition that the editor will lose admin flag if, in future, someone creates a vote that seeks to confirm him in the adminship and the vote does not achieve consensus for keeping adminship; oppose to the extent the condition is not met. This is nothing personal; it is as a matter of general useful principle. A clarification: My position is that my condition only applies if passing of the vote depends on support of editors who used this condition.
Note: When admins are easy to desysop, it is easier to take risks, enadmin even relatively new contributors and see how they perform in their admin roles. --Dan Polansky (talk) 07:31, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- By the way, here are new pages by Gamren, tools.wmflabs.org. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:10, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support a bit soon, but hey, whatevah. -Xbony2 (talk) 23:52, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Oppose
Abstain
- Abstain: A little too soon, I think. DonnanZ (talk) 09:41, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Abstain. Hasn't been around that long and hasn't made that many edits. I see no reason to oppose, however. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 19:45, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
# Abstain I have never seen this user, but we've only had one new admin in 2016, so we could definitely use a new one. Juan the fool (talk) 21:39, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Decision
Passes 4-0-2. @Chuck Entz —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 06:39, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
- Done Chuck Entz (talk) 08:47, 9 December 2016 (UTC)