Wiktionary talk:Administrators/Former

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Wiktionary talk:Administrators/Former. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Wiktionary talk:Administrators/Former, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Wiktionary talk:Administrators/Former in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Wiktionary talk:Administrators/Former you have here. The definition of the word Wiktionary talk:Administrators/Former will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofWiktionary talk:Administrators/Former, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

Commons Guidelines

I took this from the Commons site:

  • inactive administrators may have their access removed. According to this policy, any sysop inactive on Commons for a full year will be desysoped. "Inactive" means no edits in the past 6 months and fewer than 50 edits in the last year. Inactive administrators may re-apply through the regular way

Just for your information. Cheers, --Stranger 23:16, 12 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Desysopping

I was waiting until after 9/11/05 to bring the motion to desysop to the floor in order to include User:Ortonmc in the motion; but I see he has made two edits in the past week or so. Would someone e-mail him and just ask him if he wishes to remain a sysop? I don't have that access--long story. Thanks. --Stranger 23:16, 12 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Equinox

How about Equinox? This user was an admin, then isn't one anymore. Where is he on this page?--77.249.94.236 21:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

I have added myself. HTH HAND! Equinox 21:42, 9 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

RFDO discussion: August–October 2015

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion/Others (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


I don't see much point in this, TBH --A230rjfowe (talk) 00:19, 2 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Strong keep. It is history. --Dixtosa (talk) 09:20, 2 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Keep, at worst harmless, at best could be referenced in debates about old edits and who had admin powers at the time of those edits. Renard Migrant (talk) 18:02, 18 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
Keep. Good ratio of possible utility to storage space, IMO. DCDuring TALK 18:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Kept.​—msh210 (talk) 20:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Desysopping for inactivity

No admin logs

General inactivity