information to <span class="searchmatch">a</span> separate <span class="searchmatch">namespace</span>, available from <span class="searchmatch">a</span> separate tab. --Dan Polansky (talk) <span class="searchmatch">09</span>:20, 27 September <span class="searchmatch">2015</span> (UTC) @DCDuring: links to the <span class="searchmatch">Phrases</span>/Collocations...
<span class="searchmatch">2015</span> (UTC) The problem mentioned by Metaknowledge above is avoidable by using the format of Wiktionary:<span class="searchmatch">Votes</span>/<span class="searchmatch">2015</span>-<span class="searchmatch">09</span>/<span class="searchmatch">Adding</span> <span class="searchmatch">a</span> <span class="searchmatch">collocations</span> <span class="searchmatch">or</span> <span class="searchmatch">phrases</span>...
wiktionarians. What do you think about starting <span class="searchmatch">a</span> <span class="searchmatch">phrase</span> book <span class="searchmatch">section</span>? The idea occurred to me since <span class="searchmatch">a</span> Spanish speaker asked me to help her to learn English...
:''The <span class="searchmatch">vote</span> [[Wiktionary:<span class="searchmatch">Votes</span>/pl-2009-12/Unidiomatic multi-word <span class="searchmatch">phrases</span> to meet CFI when the more common spelling of <span class="searchmatch">a</span> single word]] <span class="searchmatch">adds</span> <span class="searchmatch">a</span> criterion...
stands to reason to <span class="searchmatch">add</span> <span class="searchmatch">a</span> <span class="searchmatch">section</span> in Chinese characters' entries for homophonic words irrespective of tones too --Backinstadiums (talk) <span class="searchmatch">09</span>:59, 1 October 2019...