independent issues.—msh210℠ (talk) 18:24, 16 February 2012 (UTC) Done —RuakhTALK 18:40, 16 February 2012 (UTC) Wiktionary:Beer_parlour_archive/2011/March#CFI...
Furthermore, you got the name wrong (Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-02/Brand names and physical product 2), as your vote is not about "physical product" but rather...
feels more or less the same. —RuakhTALK 02:46, 5 December 2012 (UTC) I agree. Really, I think that instead of removing it from the CFI, we need a clear policy...
recent Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2011-12/Merging_proper_nouns_into_nouns, whose rationale has 412 words, while my rationale for this vote has 217 words. I have...
this vote. To obscure this fact from the vote is highly biased. —Michael Z. 2012-03-14 02:01 z Some editors have expressed their preference that votes not...
between policy pages and common practice. As an example, Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-02/Patronymics_and_stylistic_edits_of_CFI is a perfect way to go about...
16 February 2012 (UTC) Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2008-12/curly quotes in WT:ELE may (or may not) be relevant. —RuakhTALK 22:15, 16 February 2012 (UTC) Ha, I...
well vote against that part myself, but have left it in as an option because others may not see things that way. SpinningSpark 18:02, 23 October 2012 (UTC)...
DCDuring TALK 18:12, 21 March 2012 (UTC) And indeed, [[coal mine]] had already passed RFD by the time [[Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2009-12/Unidiomatic multi-word...
votes are Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2013-10/Removing SAMPA and X-SAMPA, Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2010-05/Names of specific entities or Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2012-02/Brand...