Appendix talk:English/my hovercraft is full of eels

Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Appendix talk:English/my hovercraft is full of eels. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Appendix talk:English/my hovercraft is full of eels, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Appendix talk:English/my hovercraft is full of eels in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Appendix talk:English/my hovercraft is full of eels you have here. The definition of the word Appendix talk:English/my hovercraft is full of eels will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofAppendix talk:English/my hovercraft is full of eels, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.

RFD discussion: March 2018–February 2020

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Don't think how this phrase is useful.--Zcreator alt (talk) 16:27, 13 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Delete. It's a joke. Equinox 19:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
(Wow, is this one still open?) People don't have the same sense of humour and I bet a LOL PIRATE ZOMBIE NINJAS!!! page wouldn't survive long. This one is better because older users like it more? No it's still dumb, useless and annoying. I have a sense of humour and it's not based on pop-culture references. Equinox 03:54, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Delete. Per utramque cavernam (talk) 22:33, 13 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
Keep, it is OK to have some lighthearted appendices, as long as they don't become overly common. - TheDaveRoss 12:59, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
I don't see why we should have it at all. What purpose does it serve? Per utramque cavernam 12:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Delete it is not OK, Dave. Not OK at all --XY3999 (talk) 00:10, 22 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Keep. I wish to plead incompetence. – Jberkel 01:29, 10 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
Keep. Yes, it's silly and a joke, but I see it as more of an easter egg to put a smile on the face of who runs across it. It's also clearly separated from everything else, and if conlangs are any indication, the Appendix namespace is where we put things we don't want but don't want to delete. —Rua (mew) 17:39, 30 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Keep. Doesn't hurt. We can't let Omniglot have a monopoly on translations of silly phrases. — Eru·tuon 18:26, 30 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Delete. This phrase has no meaning except as a reference to Monty Python. Old Man Consequences (talk) 14:04, 14 February 2020 (UTC)Reply


rfdef

If the {{rfdef}} was part of the joke, I apologise. Feel free to put it back. I was mainly trying to get it out of the category. This, that and the other (talk) 14:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC)Reply