Hello, you have come here looking for the meaning of the word Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/h₂ébōl. In DICTIOUS you will not only get to know all the dictionary meanings for the word Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/h₂ébōl, but we will also tell you about its etymology, its characteristics and you will know how to say Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/h₂ébōl in singular and plural. Everything you need to know about the word Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/h₂ébōl you have here. The definition of the word Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/h₂ébōl will help you to be more precise and correct when speaking or writing your texts. Knowing the definition ofReconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/h₂ébōl, as well as those of other words, enriches your vocabulary and provides you with more and better linguistic resources.
Sogdian(ʾmʾnk/āmang?/, “apple”), Munji(āmenga), Yidgha(amuno), Pashtoمڼه(maná, “apple”), Shughniмӯн(mūn), му̊н(mū̊n, “apple”), all < Proto-Iranian*amarnaka- ~ *amarnā-, possibly reflecting earlier *abarna/ā- (via assimilation in nasality from *b..n to *m..n), ultimately from PIE *h₂ebe/ol-no/eh₂-. This hypothetical Proto-Iranian descendant might be the source of Proto-Finnic*omëna(“apple”) and Livonianumārz, displaying variation between coda *-n- and *-r- as would be expected from borrowing from a source with *-rn-.
There are several indications that the word for “apple” did not belong to the oldest layer of the Indo-European protolanguage:
The word is limited to the West Indo-European languages
It contains the phoneme */b/, which had marginal distribution in PIE
This all points that the word potentially entered the Indo-European speech continuum some time after the dissolution of the parent language.
Less substantiated theories and connections
There are several proposed connections with Semitic. These are often posited in a framework of a theoretical Atlantic language with Semitic affinities, or by pointing out overlapping mythological motifs surrounding apples suggesting some kind of cultural sharing. This is the viewpoint marked by Dozy, Vennemann, Blažek, and others, typically with connections to the root ʾ-b-l, often with Arabic or South Semitic/Ethiopian comparisons. See Arabicأُبُلَّة(ʔubulla, “figs pressed in a mass”, literally “a bulk or mass”) an obscure term, أُبُل(ʔubul, “dry herbage upon which camels fatten”). Alternatively, an extension of Orel and Stolbova's reconstructive work, connecting back to an Afro-Asiatic root for appendages, genitals, testicles, a mass, globe or round object, still found in Ethiopian languages, potentially later being extended to fruit by comparison. Beyond proposed connections featuring /ʔ/, there are potential suggestions with /ʕ/: Arabicعَبْل(ʕabl, “a bulk or mass; applied to plant life, to be ripe for harvest or with full fruits, to be full of leaves and fruits”), Arabicعَبَال(ʕabāl, “Eglantine, Rosa rubiginosa, and similar plants; Rose Hip, bright red bulbous fruit, with a sweet or tart flavor like apples”), and Tigreዖበል(ʿobäl, “Nile tamarisk, Tamarix nilotica”). To bolster this avenue and the distant relationship with Proto-Indo-European, the Laryngeal Theory reconstructs the /*h₂/ phoneme as a pharyngeal fricative consonant, basing comparison of /ħ/ and /ʕ/ as an a-coloring phonetic conditioner in contemporary languages, most notably Semitic languages.
Gamkrelidze and Ivanov argue that the Hittite cognate is 𒊭𒈠𒇻(ša-ma-lu/šam(a)lu-/, “apple”), which renders the original PIE form as *samlu-(“apple”) or *(s)h₂eml-(“apple”). The original cluster *-ml- remained as such in Anatolian, but yielded *-bl- in the other IE languages which otherwise typically finds the phoneme */b/ rare or non-existing. Such a reconstruction is not attested but in a few roots, such as the dubiously constructed root *bel-/*mel-. The initial /s/ would be an example of the Proto-Indo-European s-mobile, not being necessary to appear in other descendants. The Hittite word is however paired with the Hattic𒊭𒀀𒊀𒀜(ša-a-waₐ-at/šawat/, “apple, apple tree”) with the usual Hattic /t/ = Hittite /l/ correspondence, easily being a potential borrowing from Hattic or vice versa. The form *(s)h₂eml- may also be connected via metathesis with Proto-Kartvelian *msxal-(“pear”); note in particular the unmetathesized *sxmarṭl-(“medlar”)
Reconstruction
Germanic stem variants *apal- and *apla- point to the originally archaic ablauting paradigm.
Guus Kroonen (2013) “apla-”, in Alexander Lubotsky, editor, Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Germanic (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 11), Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN, page 31f
Dariusz R. Piwowarczyk (2014) “The Proto-Indo-European root for ‘apple’ and the problem of comparative reconstruction”, in Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia, volume 19, number 3, →DOI, →ISSN, pages 161–167